Yeah, all pretty obvious, since the first few hours. They didn't want to silence him only though, it was a public statement to decide the solution to the reaction to whatever Oswald they trot out. They could have poisoned his Big Mac if they just wanted to silence him. A good loosh harvest must have a public spectacle of horror and chaos that elicits all human negative emotions. They've been busy lately. Thanks for the links.
Can't help but think that the FBI let that first apprehended suspect go because he showed them his Mossad ID. These official narratives keep getting more and more outlandish.
Haha. Probably, they usually keep any suspects in custody for at least 12 hours, especially one acting so idiotically in the aftermath of a public assassination. He was a grand diversion. Someone needs to come up with a new line about hopeless, and propaganda. "If the situation were hopeless, their propaganda wouldn't be necessary."
Something like "If their propaganda wasn't pathetic, the situation wouldn't be hilarious."
I dunno, it's all so insulting, but every theatre needs an audience, and these script writers view us as lesser than.
I keep hoping theyβll slip up on a psyop so badly that it will be impossible to deny, but it seems the public has no limit to the horseshit they will swallow.
Has anyone else here slaughtered animals for food? I have, many times, and I don't quite understand this video of Irina. A severed artery squirts a huge amount of blood. It goes everywhere. The video implies that she lost enough blood in a few seconds to cause drowsiness and loss of consciousness, but the blood on the seat does not indicate such immediate blood loss. Also, the moment of death in all cases I have observed is accompanied by violent jerking and twitching, similar to how chickens flap after being decapitated.
If you take a look at the video of Charlie you will see exactly the type of blood flow you're talking about. Tis indeed strange we find nothing comparable with Iryna.
"The red arterial blood was spurting out of the wound in a stream half as large as one's finger and to the distance of about one foot above the boy's head."
I think I may have come across this in my research. It's so suspicious that there's no blood on her shirt, hands, or arms as she clutches. The only counterargument I could find that makes even a tiny bit of sense is that she was scrunched up in shock, pulling everything together, which may have held off the real flood, until she went to the floor, where her leaning downwards did the ugly work. That it took nearly two minutes is still very strange. I just read an hour ago that she was part of an extras casting company where she lived. Maybe she had "Amyerika" as land of stars and celebrity aspirations. I dunno. Make what you will of that.
That sounds like the only plausible explanation. Still, normal blood pressure is 120/80 mmHg, which is 2.3 psi on the high end (systolic), so it should have gushed out initially.
As for her being in a casting companyβthat makes sense. In the video, her wrists and forearms are very slender, like a fashion model's.
Thank you for this, very well-put and I was thinking many of the same things. You can't take anything seriously anymore, it's all just manipulative theatrical ass-clowning.
DaCrushChronometer on the assassination of Charlie Kirk - He was DISPENSABLE! Pray for his family - the REAL victims - but also disposable by our rulers.
Math=1+1+1+1+1....etc......
1-The choreography was perfectly staged - there was a distraction - an older man in the audience was yelling "shoot him"....according to the early reports - BEFORE THE SHOT....who was detained after the shooting.....but later released. Certainly enough time for the shooter to vamoose.
2-The reaction to Kirk's death was over the top - as if a president was killed - government, religion, media.....a list too long to put here - including the cheering of the leftist media.....totally weird! He's practically a martyr now....why?
3-Who was Charlie Kirk? Before yesterday, I bet 90+% of Americans never heard of him.
31 years old, married with 2 young children. Political history - total Trump supporter - including TOTAL support of Israel - Gaza genocide denier - according to Andrew Anglin, a compromiser of homosexuality with Christianity......and he loved the US Navy blowing up a Venezuelan fishing boat in international waters.....a NEOCON.
5-The REAL VICTIMS? Kirk's family... .but who cares......right?
6-Who benefits? Easy peasy - who benefitted from the 2000+ sailors sacrificed at Pearl Harbor? The 3000 dead employees in the Twin Towers on 9/11? All didpensable!
But let's get real - this is a governmental operation - just like all the others in history - it's just the first step - DaBiggies are lined up.....and in case you forgot.....you and I are DISPOSABLE!
Sure thing, I try to keep a steady ship when they blast us with so much so suddenly. One must ask, "How do they want me to react?" And then simply start thinking instead, about why that is.
I didn't know what "loosh" was either. Here's a definition from some dude who calls himself Sol Luckman on Goodreads:
"Loosh is a hyperdimensional energy given off by the human soul when traumatized. The Archons parasitically feed on it. Think of it as their simulacrum of kundalini."
who ever shot him did not aim for the neck. charlie was a pencil neck geek. probably aimed for the head charlie might have moved a little and it hit him in the neck. with a 100 yd zero the bullet would drop almost 3 inches but a pro would zero 200-300 yds
I'm not sure I agree Emperor Titus. This was a professional who could hit a hair off a dog's back at 500 yards, so 200 yards was probably as easy as sniping a kid in Gaza from 150, which no doubt the shooter had much experience. A head shot knocks Charlie out of his chair and backwards, with no spectacle, no mess. On a loosh harvest blood moon, the carotid artery is much more gruesome. The more horror, the more they can harvest in the mass human reactions of anger, despair, etc. to the spectacle of his death. But we're as likely to get the truth of the shooter's intentions as we are the true shooter extradited from Tel aviv.
Emperor Titus lol. dont be fooled by tales of marksmanship from shooters. most are full of shit. I have been on tons of ranges fired 1000's of rounds with 100's of guys. most were never half as good as they bragged. under controlled conditions no wind solid rest known range the right zero good shots can be made. but on a roof without a good rest things can go wrong like missing the head. remember charlie was talking to a anti gun kid and I bet anything his head was not still giving a spirited response
The Daily Beagle believes the flotilla has been attacked (see Daniel Boland's A Terrifying Ordeal! on YT), Banksy is a lone graffiti artist and not a conglomerate, hasn't evolved past It's the Zionists, doesn't comprehend what a Golem is to the Jews...
A pro wouldn't have gone for a head shot, he would have went for center mass as even the best shot isn't psychic enough to account for movement of the target and the randomness that exists even with the best shots in the best circumstances. Which this wasn't, as it was outdoors and at an angle with an animated target. World class rifle shots would likely have a margin of error of around 1/4 MOA, so ~1/2 inch at 200yds. This is not nearly good enough for hitting an artery.
A βproβ would absolutely go for a headshot if the goal is to ensure a kill, especially if there is a question of ballistic armor.
A 200 yard headshot with a scoped .30-06 is not terribly difficult, especially if made from a probe supported position (incredibly stable).
A 180-grain load leaving barrel at 2,700 fps is going to drop just under 5β under standard conditions (ie, assuming a 100 yard zero, point of impact will be just shy of 5β from point of aim).
Drop would be generally less at higher altitudes (like Utah) due to less drag with thinner air.
Slight downward angle doesnβt really add to the complexity (increases with steepness). At 200 yards, wind has minimal effect especially with standard range of bullet weights for .30-06.
So biggest variable to account for is target movement. Kirk was seated so range of where he could put his head was limited. Someone with sound basic rifle shooting fundamentals and who knew what adjustments had to be made for a cold bore shot, say a hunter, could reliably make that shot.
Would not in any way require a βproβ _IF_ the shooter was the guy on the roof.
There was no question of ballistic armor. CK was in a t-shirt, no possibility of ballistic plates.
"Slight downward angle doesnβt really add to the complexity"
Which shows you know nothing of ballistics. Dunning-Krueger in full effect.
"...say a hunter, could reliably make that shot."
Hunters almost never intentionally make head shots, and neither do snipers, for the same reasons. It's hard, and unnecessary, as the chest has a larger sized area that will ensure a kill than the head, and an even larger area that will likely result in a kill. I don't think you internet commandos know what a rifle bullet does to flesh. Not pistol, rifle. Huge difference.
Your misstatement of what I wrote and your personal attacks on me show that youβre a lazy intellect or else deliberately disingenuous. I never mentioned anything about pistol rounds or said hunters take head shots. What I said is that hunters with good fundamentals would not have trouble hitting a human head sized target at that distance from a supported prone position (the obvious unstated being that the prime target area for a deer or similar game animal at that distance would roughly be the size of a human head).
Assuming a 30 degree angle or less, your horizontal equivalent distance is going to be roughly 90% or more. Thus, not a significant complication.
You want to challenge the math or the facts and assumptions of my opinion, great. Always looking to improve my knowledge. But from your response, you seem more interested in being a blowhard. You certainly seem to have a short fuse and be a volatile person, which means youβre probably the last person who needs to be around firearms.
I mention pistols because people seem to think 'ballistic vest' means the kevlar vests that cops wear, which will stop pistol rounds but will barely affect rifle rounds. Unless CK was wearing some kind of Area-51 Cure for Cancer level of technology tshirt, armor isn't a factor in a shooter's choice of target.
If hunters w/ good fundamentals can hit a head at that distance, yet almost always choose to aim for the chest, what does that tell you about what the high percentage choice is?
"Assuming a 30 degree angle or less, your horizontal equivalent distance is going to be roughly 90% or more."
Dunning-Krueger. Sheer ignorance. Stop talking about ballistics, as you obviously know nothing about it.
=
"A 180-grain load leaving barrel at 2,700 fps is going to drop just under 5β under standard conditions (ie, assuming a 100 yard zero, point of impact will be just shy of 5β from point of aim)."
I missed this last time. You don't even know what some of these words mean, or how the math works.
Proned out on a flat roof is about as stable a position as you can get. We donβt know the grain of bullet but a 180g .30-06 at MV 2700fps would have a drop of less than 5β at 200 yards (i havenβt run the DA on the locale, but drag would be less than at sea level so less drop). And wind would not make much difference at 200 yards. So as long as the shooter had good fundamentals and knew what hold adjustments had to be made for cold bore shot, all he had to really worry about was head movement.
This is all assuming the shooter was the guy on the roof.
I was thinking that same exact thing too. It was probably an intended head shot that went too low. Even then, it's still a kill shot...
Although shrapnel from a deflected bullet is still very harmful, it's hard to say if he was wearing armor plates or not, so need to zoom in on his chest to see if he was wearing armor plates.
Gemma O'Doherty's substack outlines how the Kirk shooting was faked. My default setting now is that all media-circus events are theater...until proven otherwise. Here we are, 24 years after that day, and even the self-proclaimed "awake" are still falling for the BS. I heard the 9/11 news from my brother, rather than the news...and although I had no details... I didn't fall for the official story for one second.
The way in which the elite are pulling these bizarre pay-ops, indicate to me that they are frustrated they can't get the supine masses off their *sses... to proceed with the civil war they have planned. My metal picture of this is a dairy farmer calling his fat cows into the milking parlor...as they recline in comfort. Farmer starts yelling and prodding them with a pitchfork....as they stare vacantly into space chewing their cudd.
Yeah, that was my first reaction to it too, but not for very long.
Wait, I just visited her substack, that copy-and-paste video of Hollywood blood splatter effects means it was faked? Haha. We all need to believe what we need to believe. I guess thatβs the power of deception and living in an βeverything is fakedβ world. Heβs alive! Fantastic! Did the guy in the video she posted even bother to walk his audience through the logic of this first and what happens to a very recognizable public figure in the aftermath?
So heβs off for plastic surgery like a narco king pin to lead a new life without his wife and kids? Or are they going into witness protection to start anew with their plastic surgery-altered father? Maybe the wife and kids were actors too? Let's assume not, what happens to their Church community, friends, neighbors, when the family packs up and leaves to keep this faked thing going? Are they off to Barriloche, Argentina maybe? I look forward to finding out from sleuths soon. Sometimes, a psyop is more effective if itβs real and the reaction sets the stage for a solution. We know they have no problem killing people toward these ends. However, if it turns out to have been faked, Iβll gladly admit it when the evidence tilts in that direction.
The slow-mo clip of Kirk's shirt puffing out a second before the shot convinced me. However, if I see other evidence I will change my mind. It doesn't really matter if it's a real killing or not....the results are the same. I have been following the J-question for 35 years. Suddenly...for the first time ever... mainstream alt-news are being allowed to talk about the Jewish control. THEY are allowing it. So far, no one knows why...but I've been at this long enough to know that we just have to wait to find out why.
It only does in slow motion. Everything looks weird at 5% speed. Watch it in real time, and you'll see it's just part of the whiplash from getting struck by a projectile flying 2000 feet per second. And beneath his shirt was a soft kevlar vest, most likely which the shooter probably knew he was wearing or they would have aimed for center mass. Yeah, they definitely want people to take notice of jewish power, and this might be just another enhancement event for that agenda. It's always been a source of their power though, so they can claim persecution and play the victim when the backlash gets really nasty. Despite all this real or faked horror, I think we're still a long way from that. The cows won't get up for much as you said.
Btw, GC Im still subscribed to you, but some time ago GC disappeared from my profile page as being one of 18 that I subscribe to. Tried to get it to show up again, but something is blocking it. I'm sure I'm not the only one this has happened to.
Nah, it just means you're very good at hitting the nail on the head and it irritates them badly, life would be awfully bleak without your newsletters and saying the things many of us are thinking.
They are trying to stop you from reaching new readers. If I read an insightful comment, I check out the commenter's subscriptions. If one piques my interest, I read a few articles. Often I then subscribe. Probably all the Truth Seekers days are numbered on Substack.
Iβm of the opinion that they always make the target group protected with superior rights that supersede everyone elseβs. Then will come the whiplash where all of the sudden it changes from βchosen people β to βget βemβ. If my theory holds then itβs holocaust 2.0 time and rank and file Jews will be offered up in sacrifice-hey, just like in Germany and recently in Israel of all places where they were offered as test dummies for the shot. Hannibal directive?
I think you haven't studied the last 2000 years of history in Europe. Europeans did their best to live peacefully with Jews. They looked the other way repeatedly...UNTIL Jews crossed the line. They were never victims. They only got booted after being caught doing terrible to things. The "Jews poisoning wells" is considered a myth...yet there are accounts from all over the world, going back centuries. It is impossible for all those accounts to be faked.
The Holohoax was mostly fabricated. Yes, German work camps were terrible. My dad was in one (escaped three times)...but there were no extermination camps. Also the so called "good guys" held German POWs in horrible camps after the war ended. All this info is available to anyone who is willing to do the research.
Haha Kris. Thereβs now revisionist history of the 20th century contained in a book titled βtwo world wars and hitler, who was responsible?β. You should read it, it should be very approachable for a literal human AI like yourself who comprehends a comprehensive history of 2000 years of history in Europe. By the way it does mention the conditions faced by Germans after both wars. Anyone who gets rounded up and sent to camps just for things like who their parents and grandparents are are victims in my book whether they get gassed or not. Being mad at Jews is what the most evil people on the planet want me to be, and yes some of them are putative Jews. I prefer to try and figure out what they want me to do and then frustrate that desire.
YOU are the paid troll. Even after 35 years studying the Jewish plan for world domination I say.... the newbies to this subject don't have to study...merely look at the many online videos of crazed rabbis preaching they must destroy Amalek, saying Amalek are Christian people of European descent, how their moshiach can't return until all Christians have been wiped out. Anyway, I don't argue with trolls...so have at it. Conversation over. Rant to yourself.
Yes I could buy you 50 times over with my paid troll cash. But getting beyond that if you have to hate Jews just hate the ones doing bad things, then you wonβt be in the trap.
An excellent article, but it seems to veer dangerously close to thinking a conspiracy of the deepest sort has to have happened. The reason this is dangerous is it tempts people to waste time trying to argue the minutiae, the tactics, rather than the strategy.
I would argue the truth of what happened here (and in 9/11) is not important, as even if 100% random, the usual suspects will rush to take advantage of it to push their increasingly obvious agenda. That is what we need to focus on, their goals and how we counter those goals.
Since any leader that rises up will be subverted or killed, our only rational course of action is to keep things local. Make friends with your neighbors and work together to increase local resilience.
What? "I would argue the truth of what happened here (and in 9/11) is not important"
The only way to counter their goals, hell, to even know what those goals are, is to always seek to get as close as possible to the truth.
Local is good. There are no political solutions, but I find that incredibly liberating to the mind, and it forces one to be self-reliant and seek like-minded communities.
The value of his death in engineering the desired reaction for the waiting solution is no small thing. I didn't follow him much...err...at all since he was part of Kosher Con inc, but he seemed like a well-meaning kid who loved his country who took far too long to figure out who he was associating himself with. Nobody deserves that. Well, maybe an exception could be made for a few hundred scientists and bureaucrats behind operation warp genocide, but nobody's holding their breath.
Kirk was as milquetoast as it gets. Never went to college, yet made his career trolling college students on there home turfs, and making them look dumb in the process. He was very cordial, even with the unhinged lgbtqp++ or whatever crowd screeching there insanity trying to debate him. Once he got heavy into politics, he was pivotal getting gen z on team Trump. He was a strong asset for team red, maybe there strongest. Made him an open target from many sides. Itβs believe the DNC had him killed just as much as id believe it was mossad and Isreal, just as much as Iβd believe it was a troon that was a good shot.
Candace Owens livestream last night, she alluded to him having a spiritual awakening over βthingsββ¦.and now he is dead were her words. She talked about her stance over Gaza and that it got her sacked by daily wire but she was at pains to say that her friendship with CK was as strong as ever despite the mutterings that he had forsaken her as a friend- I think heβs been quietly watching her content over Israel and it caused him to have a crisis of conscience over who heβs been in bed with all these years- the cost to him and his soul were too high and I believe he began to question the whole Jewish problem and the reach it has in all walks of life and as a consequence he was silenced through the neck/throat.
I was working on a draft and gathering my one-liner topics and structure of what I want to say on the recent events, as I usually do before writing out my piece. I then decided to put it to rest and simmer, if even for a few hours. I've been following this horrific week pretty closely, and there's too much people shouting off too much different information for too diverse of reasons and motivations. Unfortunately, your piece did add to my confusion. Fortunately, I was already confused so it didn't add much.
At the end of the day, there are too many unknowns to construct a scenario that holds water for what happened this past week, for Iryna and for Charlie. I always value your insights, and I really appreciate your attempt to concretize and analyze the attack on both people. But I think that the information is too sparse and the situation is too fluid for me to conclude anything about parties involved.
However
There are two distinct elements that do not fit the narrative. It's like watching a good movie, only to find that an actor fucks up mid way trough:
1. Why did the old jew shout "Shoot me, shoot me" as he was led away from the scene? Such vocabulary is usually reserved for shirtless meth heads standing in the middle of the road on some industrial estate, waiting for the cops to end his life because he's too shitty to do it himself. Unless him getting shot was part of the scenario, and to me the reason for this addition to the script makes no sense. The whole thing he said makes no sense to me. Where did they find this guy, and what made him say that?
2. Why would a shooter, concealing his rifle going in and using it perched on top of a building, take his rifle along with him after shooting, and not conceal it. And then throw it in some bushes where it can be easily found? Why not leave it on the building if you are discarding it, or conceal it in the same manner on your way out? One would also think an extensive planning would involve gloves, but the darn thing was full of finger and palm prints...
As I've said before, in my mind there is no proof that we can rely on to corroborate a specification or parties involved. I think that goes for your scenario too, at least at this moment in time. But what I do think is that there is enough evidence to conclude that there is something rotten in the state of Denmark.
Just for giggles, if you want to believe in an Oswald scenario, here's the latest gossip:
"I could make a montage of eighteen months of Kirk noticing things that would upset his bettors, from Zionist infiltration of American politics, to outright genocide, to media manipulation, while consistently commenting on Jewish power in West Israel."
I'd love to see that montage - way more than the slasher forensics, truth be told [and we're all about the truth here, right? ;-) ]
It looks like our brother Mark has started to commence to begin to initiate that process with his post herein.
Do you have a source for the Rabbimon segment of the video above, that's cut in before irrefutabletv's 911 dust storm story.?
Good writing and insight as always GC - keep it coming!
I thought about putting one together, but there are dozens of montages of Kirk floating around Xvetch right now of him noticing. His last broadcast the day before he went off about the fact that it's primarily jewish money funding woke and radical marxism. On the Patrick Bet-Dufus show this year he questioned the official Oct. 7 narrative saying there was a stand-down order, and the official Israeli claims of that day were worth questioning. He wasn't joining hells angels or patriot front anytime soon, but he did a fair bit of noticing. People are saying he was a staunch Israeli defender but not the past year. He was struggling to keep up the facade. He's more useful to both West Israel and her masters dead. That all con inc. influencers are calling for violence and civil war is just the latest act in this farce coming just a few weeks after Trump said he'd put troops on the streets in mostly red states.
And this FBI press conference tonight was almost as hilarious as Naked Gun 22 and a half, and that was pretty damn funny.
I had actually been wondering if maybe it was Ukraine? He had been talking negatively about that war after all. They have combat experienced snipers available. Just scribble some tranny bs on the gun and leave it behind! Perfect cover. But, if he was on Israel's shit list, then yeah, they could do the same thing.
My spidery senses were all over the two deaths you mentioned, Charlie Kirk's death pretty much a foregone conclusion and Trump would be happy with the sacrifice of a "family friend" to deflect from the Epstein documents fallout.
The Iryna Zarustska alleged killing interests me more as it reminds me of a certain English soldier supposedly getting his head chopped off a few years ago. That was a highly suspect death from the very start but the media and government whipped up the usual masses to high emotion right from the start. In that initial report there was simply no blood anywhere, a bit was sprinkled around for the next televised report. Yet if you waited for a lot of the heat to die down and quietly researched a few things, there was no birth certificate or death certificate for that soldier and the road the heinous act was committed on was closed off that morning for filming a drama for television!!
I often wonder what happened to those two innocent "terrorists" who thought they were filming a drama, like the 7/7 train and bus bombings thought they were going to take part in a training exercise of a terrorist attack of what to be aware of in case of future terrorist attacks. Did the two end up dead like the other guys, get sent drugged up to prison for the rest of their lives? That question bothers me a lot to this day.
Which is a long way off what you were saying except I'd love to know if a certain dead young lady existed in the first place.
Thank you as always for asking the right questions and putting the time in to go through the screenshots. Great work.
Charlie was going off the reservation...
Who Gave The Stand Down Order On Oct 7th? - Charlie Kirk (1:39)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WaaOAF5EuNTJ
Jewish Donors Funding Open Borders - Charlie Kirk (0:39)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fs3WPYm6IrAF
Charlie Kirk Confronted Ben Shapiro On Israel Ethnically Cleansing - 48 Hours Prior (0:47)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VqNTYM0nAxk8
Charlie Kirk - Israel (0:44)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3Qnk9wG6wafB
Mark
Yeah, all pretty obvious, since the first few hours. They didn't want to silence him only though, it was a public statement to decide the solution to the reaction to whatever Oswald they trot out. They could have poisoned his Big Mac if they just wanted to silence him. A good loosh harvest must have a public spectacle of horror and chaos that elicits all human negative emotions. They've been busy lately. Thanks for the links.
JFK, RFK and MLK were their first warning shots.
This was a reminder to any one who might have missed those first shots?
And for all of the US military grunts, remember the Liberty too...
Can't help but think that the FBI let that first apprehended suspect go because he showed them his Mossad ID. These official narratives keep getting more and more outlandish.
Haha. Probably, they usually keep any suspects in custody for at least 12 hours, especially one acting so idiotically in the aftermath of a public assassination. He was a grand diversion. Someone needs to come up with a new line about hopeless, and propaganda. "If the situation were hopeless, their propaganda wouldn't be necessary."
Something like "If their propaganda wasn't pathetic, the situation wouldn't be hilarious."
I dunno, it's all so insulting, but every theatre needs an audience, and these script writers view us as lesser than.
Could be a different George Zinn... or not.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1757692963888761.png
I keep hoping theyβll slip up on a psyop so badly that it will be impossible to deny, but it seems the public has no limit to the horseshit they will swallow.
Ohhh, they love themselves some horeshit buffet. Watch people the last few days, they all just shut off their brains.
Has anyone else here slaughtered animals for food? I have, many times, and I don't quite understand this video of Irina. A severed artery squirts a huge amount of blood. It goes everywhere. The video implies that she lost enough blood in a few seconds to cause drowsiness and loss of consciousness, but the blood on the seat does not indicate such immediate blood loss. Also, the moment of death in all cases I have observed is accompanied by violent jerking and twitching, similar to how chickens flap after being decapitated.
Looking for answers.
GC, thanks for this calm, sane take.
If you take a look at the video of Charlie you will see exactly the type of blood flow you're talking about. Tis indeed strange we find nothing comparable with Iryna.
Yes, exactly.
Here is a medical case report of a wound of the subclavian artery, made with a knife very similar to the one in the Charlotte case.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/448043
"The red arterial blood was spurting out of the wound in a stream half as large as one's finger and to the distance of about one foot above the boy's head."
I think I may have come across this in my research. It's so suspicious that there's no blood on her shirt, hands, or arms as she clutches. The only counterargument I could find that makes even a tiny bit of sense is that she was scrunched up in shock, pulling everything together, which may have held off the real flood, until she went to the floor, where her leaning downwards did the ugly work. That it took nearly two minutes is still very strange. I just read an hour ago that she was part of an extras casting company where she lived. Maybe she had "Amyerika" as land of stars and celebrity aspirations. I dunno. Make what you will of that.
Thanks for the reply.
That sounds like the only plausible explanation. Still, normal blood pressure is 120/80 mmHg, which is 2.3 psi on the high end (systolic), so it should have gushed out initially.
As for her being in a casting companyβthat makes sense. In the video, her wrists and forearms are very slender, like a fashion model's.
Thank you for this, very well-put and I was thinking many of the same things. You can't take anything seriously anymore, it's all just manipulative theatrical ass-clowning.
DaCrushChronometer on the assassination of Charlie Kirk - He was DISPENSABLE! Pray for his family - the REAL victims - but also disposable by our rulers.
Math=1+1+1+1+1....etc......
1-The choreography was perfectly staged - there was a distraction - an older man in the audience was yelling "shoot him"....according to the early reports - BEFORE THE SHOT....who was detained after the shooting.....but later released. Certainly enough time for the shooter to vamoose.
2-The reaction to Kirk's death was over the top - as if a president was killed - government, religion, media.....a list too long to put here - including the cheering of the leftist media.....totally weird! He's practically a martyr now....why?
3-Who was Charlie Kirk? Before yesterday, I bet 90+% of Americans never heard of him.
31 years old, married with 2 young children. Political history - total Trump supporter - including TOTAL support of Israel - Gaza genocide denier - according to Andrew Anglin, a compromiser of homosexuality with Christianity......and he loved the US Navy blowing up a Venezuelan fishing boat in international waters.....a NEOCON.
4-Since I'm running out of time......all we need now is a patsy. ...I think we've got him..... - https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2025/09/11/fbi-releases-photo-of-person-of-interest-in-charlie-kirks-assassination-n2663152?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=256c797fbcabd2420c7bbed7bb7eb405954391760bbf553aa2c7a9962a2cb925&lctg=22111776
5-The REAL VICTIMS? Kirk's family... .but who cares......right?
6-Who benefits? Easy peasy - who benefitted from the 2000+ sailors sacrificed at Pearl Harbor? The 3000 dead employees in the Twin Towers on 9/11? All didpensable!
7-In case you're wondering - ......War being the lifeblood of the U.S. economy - https://edwardcurtin.com/trumps-contronymal-peace/ - so.....who is the bottom line ruler?
Just getting started - more to come!
But let's get real - this is a governmental operation - just like all the others in history - it's just the first step - DaBiggies are lined up.....and in case you forgot.....you and I are DISPOSABLE!
I appreciate your insight, thank you. Itβs been a rough week.
Sure thing, I try to keep a steady ship when they blast us with so much so suddenly. One must ask, "How do they want me to react?" And then simply start thinking instead, about why that is.
This evening, I explained the concept of loosh to my husband, who had never heard of it. And then... got your essay.
Remain stable my friends.
I didn't know what "loosh" was either. Here's a definition from some dude who calls himself Sol Luckman on Goodreads:
"Loosh is a hyperdimensional energy given off by the human soul when traumatized. The Archons parasitically feed on it. Think of it as their simulacrum of kundalini."
It's tied into the whole "prison planet" concept. Not a particularly Christian idea.
That being said, if you change "Archons" to "demons," it might work.
Agreed!
Yes, I know, Iβm trying.
who ever shot him did not aim for the neck. charlie was a pencil neck geek. probably aimed for the head charlie might have moved a little and it hit him in the neck. with a 100 yd zero the bullet would drop almost 3 inches but a pro would zero 200-300 yds
I'm not sure I agree Emperor Titus. This was a professional who could hit a hair off a dog's back at 500 yards, so 200 yards was probably as easy as sniping a kid in Gaza from 150, which no doubt the shooter had much experience. A head shot knocks Charlie out of his chair and backwards, with no spectacle, no mess. On a loosh harvest blood moon, the carotid artery is much more gruesome. The more horror, the more they can harvest in the mass human reactions of anger, despair, etc. to the spectacle of his death. But we're as likely to get the truth of the shooter's intentions as we are the true shooter extradited from Tel aviv.
Emperor Titus lol. dont be fooled by tales of marksmanship from shooters. most are full of shit. I have been on tons of ranges fired 1000's of rounds with 100's of guys. most were never half as good as they bragged. under controlled conditions no wind solid rest known range the right zero good shots can be made. but on a roof without a good rest things can go wrong like missing the head. remember charlie was talking to a anti gun kid and I bet anything his head was not still giving a spirited response
I also saw that Charlie was leaning his upper torso forward and backward while he was talking, almost like he was trying to dodge a bullet.
Maybe my imagination, but that's what I would do in his situation.
Never be a still target on any stage.
Underdog has a lot to support and agree with this too.
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/theres-more-to-the-charlie-kirk-story
The Daily Beagle believes the flotilla has been attacked (see Daniel Boland's A Terrifying Ordeal! on YT), Banksy is a lone graffiti artist and not a conglomerate, hasn't evolved past It's the Zionists, doesn't comprehend what a Golem is to the Jews...
Do tell. What is a Golem to the juice?
A pro wouldn't have gone for a head shot, he would have went for center mass as even the best shot isn't psychic enough to account for movement of the target and the randomness that exists even with the best shots in the best circumstances. Which this wasn't, as it was outdoors and at an angle with an animated target. World class rifle shots would likely have a margin of error of around 1/4 MOA, so ~1/2 inch at 200yds. This is not nearly good enough for hitting an artery.
Unless that pro knew he was wearing a Kevlar vest...and his spotter tipped his hat for him.
A βproβ would absolutely go for a headshot if the goal is to ensure a kill, especially if there is a question of ballistic armor.
A 200 yard headshot with a scoped .30-06 is not terribly difficult, especially if made from a probe supported position (incredibly stable).
A 180-grain load leaving barrel at 2,700 fps is going to drop just under 5β under standard conditions (ie, assuming a 100 yard zero, point of impact will be just shy of 5β from point of aim).
Drop would be generally less at higher altitudes (like Utah) due to less drag with thinner air.
Slight downward angle doesnβt really add to the complexity (increases with steepness). At 200 yards, wind has minimal effect especially with standard range of bullet weights for .30-06.
So biggest variable to account for is target movement. Kirk was seated so range of where he could put his head was limited. Someone with sound basic rifle shooting fundamentals and who knew what adjustments had to be made for a cold bore shot, say a hunter, could reliably make that shot.
Would not in any way require a βproβ _IF_ the shooter was the guy on the roof.
There was no question of ballistic armor. CK was in a t-shirt, no possibility of ballistic plates.
"Slight downward angle doesnβt really add to the complexity"
Which shows you know nothing of ballistics. Dunning-Krueger in full effect.
"...say a hunter, could reliably make that shot."
Hunters almost never intentionally make head shots, and neither do snipers, for the same reasons. It's hard, and unnecessary, as the chest has a larger sized area that will ensure a kill than the head, and an even larger area that will likely result in a kill. I don't think you internet commandos know what a rifle bullet does to flesh. Not pistol, rifle. Huge difference.
Your misstatement of what I wrote and your personal attacks on me show that youβre a lazy intellect or else deliberately disingenuous. I never mentioned anything about pistol rounds or said hunters take head shots. What I said is that hunters with good fundamentals would not have trouble hitting a human head sized target at that distance from a supported prone position (the obvious unstated being that the prime target area for a deer or similar game animal at that distance would roughly be the size of a human head).
Assuming a 30 degree angle or less, your horizontal equivalent distance is going to be roughly 90% or more. Thus, not a significant complication.
You want to challenge the math or the facts and assumptions of my opinion, great. Always looking to improve my knowledge. But from your response, you seem more interested in being a blowhard. You certainly seem to have a short fuse and be a volatile person, which means youβre probably the last person who needs to be around firearms.
I mention pistols because people seem to think 'ballistic vest' means the kevlar vests that cops wear, which will stop pistol rounds but will barely affect rifle rounds. Unless CK was wearing some kind of Area-51 Cure for Cancer level of technology tshirt, armor isn't a factor in a shooter's choice of target.
If hunters w/ good fundamentals can hit a head at that distance, yet almost always choose to aim for the chest, what does that tell you about what the high percentage choice is?
"Assuming a 30 degree angle or less, your horizontal equivalent distance is going to be roughly 90% or more."
Dunning-Krueger. Sheer ignorance. Stop talking about ballistics, as you obviously know nothing about it.
=
"A 180-grain load leaving barrel at 2,700 fps is going to drop just under 5β under standard conditions (ie, assuming a 100 yard zero, point of impact will be just shy of 5β from point of aim)."
I missed this last time. You don't even know what some of these words mean, or how the math works.
Just stop.
Proned out on a flat roof is about as stable a position as you can get. We donβt know the grain of bullet but a 180g .30-06 at MV 2700fps would have a drop of less than 5β at 200 yards (i havenβt run the DA on the locale, but drag would be less than at sea level so less drop). And wind would not make much difference at 200 yards. So as long as the shooter had good fundamentals and knew what hold adjustments had to be made for cold bore shot, all he had to really worry about was head movement.
This is all assuming the shooter was the guy on the roof.
I was thinking that same exact thing too. It was probably an intended head shot that went too low. Even then, it's still a kill shot...
Although shrapnel from a deflected bullet is still very harmful, it's hard to say if he was wearing armor plates or not, so need to zoom in on his chest to see if he was wearing armor plates.
Gemma O'Doherty's substack outlines how the Kirk shooting was faked. My default setting now is that all media-circus events are theater...until proven otherwise. Here we are, 24 years after that day, and even the self-proclaimed "awake" are still falling for the BS. I heard the 9/11 news from my brother, rather than the news...and although I had no details... I didn't fall for the official story for one second.
The way in which the elite are pulling these bizarre pay-ops, indicate to me that they are frustrated they can't get the supine masses off their *sses... to proceed with the civil war they have planned. My metal picture of this is a dairy farmer calling his fat cows into the milking parlor...as they recline in comfort. Farmer starts yelling and prodding them with a pitchfork....as they stare vacantly into space chewing their cudd.
Yeah, that was my first reaction to it too, but not for very long.
Wait, I just visited her substack, that copy-and-paste video of Hollywood blood splatter effects means it was faked? Haha. We all need to believe what we need to believe. I guess thatβs the power of deception and living in an βeverything is fakedβ world. Heβs alive! Fantastic! Did the guy in the video she posted even bother to walk his audience through the logic of this first and what happens to a very recognizable public figure in the aftermath?
So heβs off for plastic surgery like a narco king pin to lead a new life without his wife and kids? Or are they going into witness protection to start anew with their plastic surgery-altered father? Maybe the wife and kids were actors too? Let's assume not, what happens to their Church community, friends, neighbors, when the family packs up and leaves to keep this faked thing going? Are they off to Barriloche, Argentina maybe? I look forward to finding out from sleuths soon. Sometimes, a psyop is more effective if itβs real and the reaction sets the stage for a solution. We know they have no problem killing people toward these ends. However, if it turns out to have been faked, Iβll gladly admit it when the evidence tilts in that direction.
The slow-mo clip of Kirk's shirt puffing out a second before the shot convinced me. However, if I see other evidence I will change my mind. It doesn't really matter if it's a real killing or not....the results are the same. I have been following the J-question for 35 years. Suddenly...for the first time ever... mainstream alt-news are being allowed to talk about the Jewish control. THEY are allowing it. So far, no one knows why...but I've been at this long enough to know that we just have to wait to find out why.
It only does in slow motion. Everything looks weird at 5% speed. Watch it in real time, and you'll see it's just part of the whiplash from getting struck by a projectile flying 2000 feet per second. And beneath his shirt was a soft kevlar vest, most likely which the shooter probably knew he was wearing or they would have aimed for center mass. Yeah, they definitely want people to take notice of jewish power, and this might be just another enhancement event for that agenda. It's always been a source of their power though, so they can claim persecution and play the victim when the backlash gets really nasty. Despite all this real or faked horror, I think we're still a long way from that. The cows won't get up for much as you said.
https://x.com/uncensoredshare/status/1966223979414433840/video/1
Btw, GC Im still subscribed to you, but some time ago GC disappeared from my profile page as being one of 18 that I subscribe to. Tried to get it to show up again, but something is blocking it. I'm sure I'm not the only one this has happened to.
Thanks for letting me know. Maybe my time has come.
Nah, it just means you're very good at hitting the nail on the head and it irritates them badly, life would be awfully bleak without your newsletters and saying the things many of us are thinking.
They are trying to stop you from reaching new readers. If I read an insightful comment, I check out the commenter's subscriptions. If one piques my interest, I read a few articles. Often I then subscribe. Probably all the Truth Seekers days are numbered on Substack.
Iβm of the opinion that they always make the target group protected with superior rights that supersede everyone elseβs. Then will come the whiplash where all of the sudden it changes from βchosen people β to βget βemβ. If my theory holds then itβs holocaust 2.0 time and rank and file Jews will be offered up in sacrifice-hey, just like in Germany and recently in Israel of all places where they were offered as test dummies for the shot. Hannibal directive?
I think you haven't studied the last 2000 years of history in Europe. Europeans did their best to live peacefully with Jews. They looked the other way repeatedly...UNTIL Jews crossed the line. They were never victims. They only got booted after being caught doing terrible to things. The "Jews poisoning wells" is considered a myth...yet there are accounts from all over the world, going back centuries. It is impossible for all those accounts to be faked.
The Holohoax was mostly fabricated. Yes, German work camps were terrible. My dad was in one (escaped three times)...but there were no extermination camps. Also the so called "good guys" held German POWs in horrible camps after the war ended. All this info is available to anyone who is willing to do the research.
Haha Kris. Thereβs now revisionist history of the 20th century contained in a book titled βtwo world wars and hitler, who was responsible?β. You should read it, it should be very approachable for a literal human AI like yourself who comprehends a comprehensive history of 2000 years of history in Europe. By the way it does mention the conditions faced by Germans after both wars. Anyone who gets rounded up and sent to camps just for things like who their parents and grandparents are are victims in my book whether they get gassed or not. Being mad at Jews is what the most evil people on the planet want me to be, and yes some of them are putative Jews. I prefer to try and figure out what they want me to do and then frustrate that desire.
YOU are the paid troll. Even after 35 years studying the Jewish plan for world domination I say.... the newbies to this subject don't have to study...merely look at the many online videos of crazed rabbis preaching they must destroy Amalek, saying Amalek are Christian people of European descent, how their moshiach can't return until all Christians have been wiped out. Anyway, I don't argue with trolls...so have at it. Conversation over. Rant to yourself.
Yes I could buy you 50 times over with my paid troll cash. But getting beyond that if you have to hate Jews just hate the ones doing bad things, then you wonβt be in the trap.
That was well done bro. Good points and you did it respectfully.
An excellent article, but it seems to veer dangerously close to thinking a conspiracy of the deepest sort has to have happened. The reason this is dangerous is it tempts people to waste time trying to argue the minutiae, the tactics, rather than the strategy.
I would argue the truth of what happened here (and in 9/11) is not important, as even if 100% random, the usual suspects will rush to take advantage of it to push their increasingly obvious agenda. That is what we need to focus on, their goals and how we counter those goals.
Since any leader that rises up will be subverted or killed, our only rational course of action is to keep things local. Make friends with your neighbors and work together to increase local resilience.
What? "I would argue the truth of what happened here (and in 9/11) is not important"
The only way to counter their goals, hell, to even know what those goals are, is to always seek to get as close as possible to the truth.
Local is good. There are no political solutions, but I find that incredibly liberating to the mind, and it forces one to be self-reliant and seek like-minded communities.
Here in Sydney Australia:
Though i read dozens of posts each day i'd never heard of CK 'til he got shot.
Now nearly every post is talkin' about CK - even today's Russia Today has two
items about him... I never knew him before, and now that he has been turned
into a medium for propaganda, i guess i'll never know who CK really was !!
The value of his death in engineering the desired reaction for the waiting solution is no small thing. I didn't follow him much...err...at all since he was part of Kosher Con inc, but he seemed like a well-meaning kid who loved his country who took far too long to figure out who he was associating himself with. Nobody deserves that. Well, maybe an exception could be made for a few hundred scientists and bureaucrats behind operation warp genocide, but nobody's holding their breath.
Well, they say that 30 is the new 20, which might explain why he was so... taken in by Israel. At least until somewhat recently.
Kirk was as milquetoast as it gets. Never went to college, yet made his career trolling college students on there home turfs, and making them look dumb in the process. He was very cordial, even with the unhinged lgbtqp++ or whatever crowd screeching there insanity trying to debate him. Once he got heavy into politics, he was pivotal getting gen z on team Trump. He was a strong asset for team red, maybe there strongest. Made him an open target from many sides. Itβs believe the DNC had him killed just as much as id believe it was mossad and Isreal, just as much as Iβd believe it was a troon that was a good shot.
Candace Owens livestream last night, she alluded to him having a spiritual awakening over βthingsββ¦.and now he is dead were her words. She talked about her stance over Gaza and that it got her sacked by daily wire but she was at pains to say that her friendship with CK was as strong as ever despite the mutterings that he had forsaken her as a friend- I think heβs been quietly watching her content over Israel and it caused him to have a crisis of conscience over who heβs been in bed with all these years- the cost to him and his soul were too high and I believe he began to question the whole Jewish problem and the reach it has in all walks of life and as a consequence he was silenced through the neck/throat.
I was working on a draft and gathering my one-liner topics and structure of what I want to say on the recent events, as I usually do before writing out my piece. I then decided to put it to rest and simmer, if even for a few hours. I've been following this horrific week pretty closely, and there's too much people shouting off too much different information for too diverse of reasons and motivations. Unfortunately, your piece did add to my confusion. Fortunately, I was already confused so it didn't add much.
At the end of the day, there are too many unknowns to construct a scenario that holds water for what happened this past week, for Iryna and for Charlie. I always value your insights, and I really appreciate your attempt to concretize and analyze the attack on both people. But I think that the information is too sparse and the situation is too fluid for me to conclude anything about parties involved.
However
There are two distinct elements that do not fit the narrative. It's like watching a good movie, only to find that an actor fucks up mid way trough:
1. Why did the old jew shout "Shoot me, shoot me" as he was led away from the scene? Such vocabulary is usually reserved for shirtless meth heads standing in the middle of the road on some industrial estate, waiting for the cops to end his life because he's too shitty to do it himself. Unless him getting shot was part of the scenario, and to me the reason for this addition to the script makes no sense. The whole thing he said makes no sense to me. Where did they find this guy, and what made him say that?
2. Why would a shooter, concealing his rifle going in and using it perched on top of a building, take his rifle along with him after shooting, and not conceal it. And then throw it in some bushes where it can be easily found? Why not leave it on the building if you are discarding it, or conceal it in the same manner on your way out? One would also think an extensive planning would involve gloves, but the darn thing was full of finger and palm prints...
As I've said before, in my mind there is no proof that we can rely on to corroborate a specification or parties involved. I think that goes for your scenario too, at least at this moment in time. But what I do think is that there is enough evidence to conclude that there is something rotten in the state of Denmark.
Just for giggles, if you want to believe in an Oswald scenario, here's the latest gossip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDC6OnG14Ao
Number 2 is like a perfectly readable passport floating down to be found at the 9/11 site.
"I could make a montage of eighteen months of Kirk noticing things that would upset his bettors, from Zionist infiltration of American politics, to outright genocide, to media manipulation, while consistently commenting on Jewish power in West Israel."
I'd love to see that montage - way more than the slasher forensics, truth be told [and we're all about the truth here, right? ;-) ]
It looks like our brother Mark has started to commence to begin to initiate that process with his post herein.
Do you have a source for the Rabbimon segment of the video above, that's cut in before irrefutabletv's 911 dust storm story.?
Good writing and insight as always GC - keep it coming!
I thought about putting one together, but there are dozens of montages of Kirk floating around Xvetch right now of him noticing. His last broadcast the day before he went off about the fact that it's primarily jewish money funding woke and radical marxism. On the Patrick Bet-Dufus show this year he questioned the official Oct. 7 narrative saying there was a stand-down order, and the official Israeli claims of that day were worth questioning. He wasn't joining hells angels or patriot front anytime soon, but he did a fair bit of noticing. People are saying he was a staunch Israeli defender but not the past year. He was struggling to keep up the facade. He's more useful to both West Israel and her masters dead. That all con inc. influencers are calling for violence and civil war is just the latest act in this farce coming just a few weeks after Trump said he'd put troops on the streets in mostly red states.
And this FBI press conference tonight was almost as hilarious as Naked Gun 22 and a half, and that was pretty damn funny.
I had actually been wondering if maybe it was Ukraine? He had been talking negatively about that war after all. They have combat experienced snipers available. Just scribble some tranny bs on the gun and leave it behind! Perfect cover. But, if he was on Israel's shit list, then yeah, they could do the same thing.
Dear GC
If you could please send me the source for this:
Satanyahoo and Trump both send out their βtweetβ condolences at the exact same timestamp, as if scheduled?
And the link for the 1:11 video about jews and Kirk.
https://earthnewspaper.com/contact
Thank you
Mark
03:02 EST maybe. Link here Mark:
https://x.com/BoNair02496/status/1965983382245908965
Dear GC
Thank you.
Mark
My spidery senses were all over the two deaths you mentioned, Charlie Kirk's death pretty much a foregone conclusion and Trump would be happy with the sacrifice of a "family friend" to deflect from the Epstein documents fallout.
The Iryna Zarustska alleged killing interests me more as it reminds me of a certain English soldier supposedly getting his head chopped off a few years ago. That was a highly suspect death from the very start but the media and government whipped up the usual masses to high emotion right from the start. In that initial report there was simply no blood anywhere, a bit was sprinkled around for the next televised report. Yet if you waited for a lot of the heat to die down and quietly researched a few things, there was no birth certificate or death certificate for that soldier and the road the heinous act was committed on was closed off that morning for filming a drama for television!!
I often wonder what happened to those two innocent "terrorists" who thought they were filming a drama, like the 7/7 train and bus bombings thought they were going to take part in a training exercise of a terrorist attack of what to be aware of in case of future terrorist attacks. Did the two end up dead like the other guys, get sent drugged up to prison for the rest of their lives? That question bothers me a lot to this day.
Which is a long way off what you were saying except I'd love to know if a certain dead young lady existed in the first place.
Thank you as always for asking the right questions and putting the time in to go through the screenshots. Great work.