One vital question is unanswered: why did Britain want war?
It's revealing that the Wikipedia entry for Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) doesn't even mention Polish atrocities; the story skips straight from 1936 to 1939 and says nothing about boycotts, expropriations, murders or the massacre.
One vital question is unanswered: why did Britain want war?
It's revealing that the Wikipedia entry for Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) doesn't even mention Polish atrocities; the story skips straight from 1936 to 1939 and says nothing about boycotts, expropriations, murders or the massacre.
'The local populace was required to acquire Polish citizenship or leave the country. This led to a drastic decline in ethnically German residents, whose number within the town decreased from over 40.000 in 1910 to 11,016 in 1926.'
Also, one would never know that Bromberg acquired its still-standing architectural heritage and municipal status by the labours of German settlers (earlier primitive Polish fishing settlement and fortress notwithstanding). It's a shame that West Slavs,--Czechs and Slovaks are just as bad--choose to engage in systematic historical lies by omission.
Just one ackchewally: 'Not only did Poland spur every peace offering...'
Bloody Sunday is considered "Nazi Propaganda " by NPCs with toilet paper history PhDs. Everything they don't want poisoning their dogmas and myths is applied this label. The Polish government is still demanding trillions in reparations from Germany as if they were poor innocent victims. Wikipravda has been a comedy site for at least a decade. When i read the WW2 entries I have to give myself breaks every five minutes so I don't die of laughter. Thanks for the typo alert. Edit: To answer your question on Britain wanting war...
Initially it may have been arroganace and hubris around the power of the British empire at the time, and their ability to enforce Versailles. Probably the same applies to their views of French power, with their commical immaginot line. The "truther" side of me believes there were conspirators working behind the scenes as they do (not just bankers in this case, though them as well) and the many actors in the production - Chamberlain, Halifax, Henderson, and soon after Churchill were acting on their behalf. Churchill's motives can be linked to a group called The Focus, who bought his debts (controlled him?) and supported his lavish lifestyle, drunkeness and penchant for gambling, and used him to lure the American empire into swallowing the British empire (debt guarantees-gold transfers) and then into the war. This can't be applied so easily to Halifax and Chamberlain, whom while luring Poland into the 1939 trap had a change of heart after getting their asses handed to them in 1940, and were seriously entertaining Hitler's very generous peace offerings in the wake of the Dunkirk flotilla. Churchill wouldn't permit it and quashed it by ramping up the indiscriminate bombing of Berlin. To echo Daryl Cooper's sentiment, he was by all measures the chief villain of the conflict that guaranteed a wider war...not Hitler.
Anyway thanks for reply; this is a plausible explanation except that, as you say, it doesn't fully account for the behaviour of Chamberlain etc. Why would they have been so concerned about Churchill's personal straits? Why not just let him go under? Why did Chamberlain change his mind?
Chamberlain (and Halifax) may have taken a lot of guff from the war hawks after Czechosloavkia, and wanted to put his foot down on Poland. I don't know that they were concerned at all with Churchill's straights or aware of who subsidized him, but they saw reason for a peaceful resolution given Hitler's generous terms, and the German carpet bombing of leaflets for those terms across Britain appealed to a majority of Brits, tired of war. Churchill wouldn't have it. Chamberlain was already ill by then and died in Nov 40'
Why did Britain want war? Better stated as “who” in Britain wanted war. Ever hear of the term British Israelism?
Distill the entire war down to the capstone event in 1948. Give you 1 guess what that was.
The entire point of WW2 was the infilling of Palestine with the cream of the crop of Jews - the Eastern European Jews, who were the most established, intellectual, cultured, and wealthy of all Jews throughout the world. No way were they going to give up their life in Europe to move to the backwaters of Palestine, so they needed some “encouragement”.
And we know that Japan was baited into Pearl Harbor, which necessarily triggered the U.S. into the great conflict. Dig into the players surrounding Roosevelt at the time.
It was all a huge manipulation with one goal - the formation of the state of Israel and the infilling of that state with the European Jews.
Here is a curiosity: has anybody ever been to the George Washington Masonic Memorial in Alexandria VA? You’ll find a curious display on one of the floors of that very odd building, of the Jewish Priesthood. Now what does that have to do with old George and The Masons?
Well said Prophesy. This is where the "truther" side of me would continue on the line of who were The Focus? or rather who controlled Churchill? Most "official" historians would screech and make uncomfortable gurgling noises around "anti-semitism" but even "rebel" historians wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. The split of Jewish communist control in the east and Jewish zionist control of the west is far too understated in the motivations of Britain and America, using Germany's desire to rid itself of Jewish control against them. The manipulation is everywhere, with the manipulators controlling the historical narratives to this day for their benefit. Hold on one second, my beeper is paging me.
I don’t think that the war, or the outcome of it, was necessarily part of ‘the plan’. ‘The plan’ had always been (at least since the Zionist movement officially began) to settle European Jews in Palestine. The conflict(s) between the different European factions resulted in war, as conflicts between nations often do. Hopefully you haven’t bought into the notion that every war was orchestrated perfectly according to the plan of some secret conspiracy, like the ridiculous theory that Hitler was a Rothschild or similar flat-earther QTard type nonsense.
No serious conspiracy researcher gives any credibility to Q and recognizes it for the deep state op it is. And no serious conspiracy researcher is the slightest bit fazed by browbeat tactics like insults. Everything is fairly open and naked right now, with some discernment. Yes, all wars are well orchestrated, even down to the Crips and Bloods. Whoever you may find at the controls, it’s always the same M.O. of, “Let’s you and him fight”.
That’s simple minded. Of course there is flexibility in the theater of war, but the outcome?, yes, absolutely.
You are either defending the conspiracy, or are one of those in denial at just how big it is. Most people are “educated” into ignorance and dare not break with their segment of the mob for fear of the social consequences.
I recommend researching the link between the Thule Society, Theosophy, and Freemasonry.
As well as W D Stead, the Empire Press Union, and the Pilgrims Society.
You'll find that Hitler was not working for Germany, and his ascent to power was a result of a propaganda campaign carried out by a cult who called him, "Maitreya".
If he was killed, like in some popular time travel fictions, the group would have found some other orator to perform his role.
To add to GC's work Achilles, I can say to your question "why does a dog eat his own shit?" The turn of the 20th century saw the conversion of coal to oil and combustible engines. Germany was the greatest country in Europe, bar none. Germany had built a railroad destined for Iraq. Thieving England was the sole superpower. If you believe that abdication story of King Edward to marry the woman he loved, think again. The British are SaxeCoberg-Gothe, Germans. They took Windsor to cover up their heritage, exactly the same heritage as the country they wanted war with. Germany was getting to strong. A competitor beyond Englands imagination. Thing is, they didn't have the muscle or machinery to fight Germany. Col House went to Wilson, who was cheating on his wife and bribed him to get into WW1. Germany won that war against Britain, until Wilson entered in 1917. WW11 saw, what is in my estimation, the greatest leader the modern world has ever seen. What Hitler did had never been done, by any leader. Or since then. That was the death knell for Germany as England recruited most of the worlds armies to save their ass by crushing that once great country. So why did Britain want war? Jealousy, cowardice, narcissism, conceit, anger and rage. Because they could. Because they wanted The M.E. Because Hitler was just a few kliks away. Because Germany was too great. They had indoor plumbing while that only existed in Buckingham Palace ( a little levity). BTW, England completely eliminated their out houses by 1978. Ain't that a testament.
Nah, the English didn't want the war. No 18-year-old is going to march off to war so that Jaguar wouldn't have to compete with Mercedes. The Germans didn't want it either. Nor did the French, nor, for that matter, did Americans or Canadians. No one knows what the Russians wanted. They were too busy getting genocided to make their voices heard. The Jews, however, did want the war.
This is capital work.
One vital question is unanswered: why did Britain want war?
It's revealing that the Wikipedia entry for Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) doesn't even mention Polish atrocities; the story skips straight from 1936 to 1939 and says nothing about boycotts, expropriations, murders or the massacre.
'The local populace was required to acquire Polish citizenship or leave the country. This led to a drastic decline in ethnically German residents, whose number within the town decreased from over 40.000 in 1910 to 11,016 in 1926.'
Also, one would never know that Bromberg acquired its still-standing architectural heritage and municipal status by the labours of German settlers (earlier primitive Polish fishing settlement and fortress notwithstanding). It's a shame that West Slavs,--Czechs and Slovaks are just as bad--choose to engage in systematic historical lies by omission.
Just one ackchewally: 'Not only did Poland spur every peace offering...'
You meant spurn?
Bloody Sunday is considered "Nazi Propaganda " by NPCs with toilet paper history PhDs. Everything they don't want poisoning their dogmas and myths is applied this label. The Polish government is still demanding trillions in reparations from Germany as if they were poor innocent victims. Wikipravda has been a comedy site for at least a decade. When i read the WW2 entries I have to give myself breaks every five minutes so I don't die of laughter. Thanks for the typo alert. Edit: To answer your question on Britain wanting war...
Initially it may have been arroganace and hubris around the power of the British empire at the time, and their ability to enforce Versailles. Probably the same applies to their views of French power, with their commical immaginot line. The "truther" side of me believes there were conspirators working behind the scenes as they do (not just bankers in this case, though them as well) and the many actors in the production - Chamberlain, Halifax, Henderson, and soon after Churchill were acting on their behalf. Churchill's motives can be linked to a group called The Focus, who bought his debts (controlled him?) and supported his lavish lifestyle, drunkeness and penchant for gambling, and used him to lure the American empire into swallowing the British empire (debt guarantees-gold transfers) and then into the war. This can't be applied so easily to Halifax and Chamberlain, whom while luring Poland into the 1939 trap had a change of heart after getting their asses handed to them in 1940, and were seriously entertaining Hitler's very generous peace offerings in the wake of the Dunkirk flotilla. Churchill wouldn't permit it and quashed it by ramping up the indiscriminate bombing of Berlin. To echo Daryl Cooper's sentiment, he was by all measures the chief villain of the conflict that guaranteed a wider war...not Hitler.
I meant 1926, not 1936...
Anyway thanks for reply; this is a plausible explanation except that, as you say, it doesn't fully account for the behaviour of Chamberlain etc. Why would they have been so concerned about Churchill's personal straits? Why not just let him go under? Why did Chamberlain change his mind?
A separate article maybe...
Chamberlain (and Halifax) may have taken a lot of guff from the war hawks after Czechosloavkia, and wanted to put his foot down on Poland. I don't know that they were concerned at all with Churchill's straights or aware of who subsidized him, but they saw reason for a peaceful resolution given Hitler's generous terms, and the German carpet bombing of leaflets for those terms across Britain appealed to a majority of Brits, tired of war. Churchill wouldn't have it. Chamberlain was already ill by then and died in Nov 40'
Why did Britain want war? Better stated as “who” in Britain wanted war. Ever hear of the term British Israelism?
Distill the entire war down to the capstone event in 1948. Give you 1 guess what that was.
The entire point of WW2 was the infilling of Palestine with the cream of the crop of Jews - the Eastern European Jews, who were the most established, intellectual, cultured, and wealthy of all Jews throughout the world. No way were they going to give up their life in Europe to move to the backwaters of Palestine, so they needed some “encouragement”.
And we know that Japan was baited into Pearl Harbor, which necessarily triggered the U.S. into the great conflict. Dig into the players surrounding Roosevelt at the time.
It was all a huge manipulation with one goal - the formation of the state of Israel and the infilling of that state with the European Jews.
Here is a curiosity: has anybody ever been to the George Washington Masonic Memorial in Alexandria VA? You’ll find a curious display on one of the floors of that very odd building, of the Jewish Priesthood. Now what does that have to do with old George and The Masons?
https://youtu.be/w4zETeWr1lE?si=AdL7UTPYsmHygM54
At the 6:42ish mark he shows the Levitical High Priest.
Well said Prophesy. This is where the "truther" side of me would continue on the line of who were The Focus? or rather who controlled Churchill? Most "official" historians would screech and make uncomfortable gurgling noises around "anti-semitism" but even "rebel" historians wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. The split of Jewish communist control in the east and Jewish zionist control of the west is far too understated in the motivations of Britain and America, using Germany's desire to rid itself of Jewish control against them. The manipulation is everywhere, with the manipulators controlling the historical narratives to this day for their benefit. Hold on one second, my beeper is paging me.
😂😂😂beeper. Love it!
No doubt there's at least some truth in your explanation.
I don’t think that the war, or the outcome of it, was necessarily part of ‘the plan’. ‘The plan’ had always been (at least since the Zionist movement officially began) to settle European Jews in Palestine. The conflict(s) between the different European factions resulted in war, as conflicts between nations often do. Hopefully you haven’t bought into the notion that every war was orchestrated perfectly according to the plan of some secret conspiracy, like the ridiculous theory that Hitler was a Rothschild or similar flat-earther QTard type nonsense.
No serious conspiracy researcher gives any credibility to Q and recognizes it for the deep state op it is. And no serious conspiracy researcher is the slightest bit fazed by browbeat tactics like insults. Everything is fairly open and naked right now, with some discernment. Yes, all wars are well orchestrated, even down to the Crips and Bloods. Whoever you may find at the controls, it’s always the same M.O. of, “Let’s you and him fight”.
So the entire war and the outcome was entirely orchestrated, a forgone conclusion? You really believe this?
That’s simple minded. Of course there is flexibility in the theater of war, but the outcome?, yes, absolutely.
You are either defending the conspiracy, or are one of those in denial at just how big it is. Most people are “educated” into ignorance and dare not break with their segment of the mob for fear of the social consequences.
I recommend researching the link between the Thule Society, Theosophy, and Freemasonry.
As well as W D Stead, the Empire Press Union, and the Pilgrims Society.
You'll find that Hitler was not working for Germany, and his ascent to power was a result of a propaganda campaign carried out by a cult who called him, "Maitreya".
If he was killed, like in some popular time travel fictions, the group would have found some other orator to perform his role.
Equally Putin doesn't work for Russia.
And without him, we'd still have the Ukraine war.
To add to GC's work Achilles, I can say to your question "why does a dog eat his own shit?" The turn of the 20th century saw the conversion of coal to oil and combustible engines. Germany was the greatest country in Europe, bar none. Germany had built a railroad destined for Iraq. Thieving England was the sole superpower. If you believe that abdication story of King Edward to marry the woman he loved, think again. The British are SaxeCoberg-Gothe, Germans. They took Windsor to cover up their heritage, exactly the same heritage as the country they wanted war with. Germany was getting to strong. A competitor beyond Englands imagination. Thing is, they didn't have the muscle or machinery to fight Germany. Col House went to Wilson, who was cheating on his wife and bribed him to get into WW1. Germany won that war against Britain, until Wilson entered in 1917. WW11 saw, what is in my estimation, the greatest leader the modern world has ever seen. What Hitler did had never been done, by any leader. Or since then. That was the death knell for Germany as England recruited most of the worlds armies to save their ass by crushing that once great country. So why did Britain want war? Jealousy, cowardice, narcissism, conceit, anger and rage. Because they could. Because they wanted The M.E. Because Hitler was just a few kliks away. Because Germany was too great. They had indoor plumbing while that only existed in Buckingham Palace ( a little levity). BTW, England completely eliminated their out houses by 1978. Ain't that a testament.
Nah, the English didn't want the war. No 18-year-old is going to march off to war so that Jaguar wouldn't have to compete with Mercedes. The Germans didn't want it either. Nor did the French, nor, for that matter, did Americans or Canadians. No one knows what the Russians wanted. They were too busy getting genocided to make their voices heard. The Jews, however, did want the war.
Yes—there is much truth here