The CIA has LOTS of leaks, but it is also not the case that everyone is in the know, so to speak. Far from it. Like all nodes in the cabal, it is highly compartmentalized and ultimately controlled by a powerful few who work for said cabal.
Also, the CIA does not have to have the coordination and discipline to be everywhere all at once to …
The CIA has LOTS of leaks, but it is also not the case that everyone is in the know, so to speak. Far from it. Like all nodes in the cabal, it is highly compartmentalized and ultimately controlled by a powerful few who work for said cabal.
Also, the CIA does not have to have the coordination and discipline to be everywhere all at once to serve its purpose for its masters. On the contrary, while I have great sympathy for the view that government agencies are hopelessly ineffective at their espoused purposes, the "dolts botching shit" (TM Sage Hana) perception provides excellent cover.
The same could be said of the UN. On the one hand, it seems like a large and ineffective bureaucratic institution that simply wastes tons of money. On the other hand, it serves a very different set of purposes altogether from what the public understands, which it is highly effective at, namely, promoting the man-made global warming ruse and systematically executing many of the critical steps needed to implement one-world government vis a vis Agenda 21 and all of its related offshoots, including the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Agenda. (See Patrick Wood's, Technocracy and other books for more on this.)
The CIA most certainly does not suck at everything, nor does the UN. They suck at serving We the People, but excel at serving others.
I worry that this is becoming an unfalsifiable position. If they do their stated job, then they're highly effective. If they don't do their stated job, then they weren't actually supposed to be doing *that* job.
I'm not trolling you. It's clear that there's some level of global coordination here, but I worry when we try to make everything fit into the puzzle. People just aren't that smart, especially people in government. There has to be room for mistakes and coincidences.
No worries. There is enormous scope for mistakes and coincidences. I can only share where extensive booking reading and other research has led me. I will always want to hear other perspectives, especially if the research is comparable (or better) and leads to different findings. But speculation without commensurate research and compelling arguments is always going to be, well, less compelling for me. Atb.
Admittedly, I'm not a researcher. However, I do know that humans have a deep desire to connect things that in reality may be separate. Our brains are just wired that way. I think it's important to guard against this tendency.
The CIA has LOTS of leaks, but it is also not the case that everyone is in the know, so to speak. Far from it. Like all nodes in the cabal, it is highly compartmentalized and ultimately controlled by a powerful few who work for said cabal.
Also, the CIA does not have to have the coordination and discipline to be everywhere all at once to serve its purpose for its masters. On the contrary, while I have great sympathy for the view that government agencies are hopelessly ineffective at their espoused purposes, the "dolts botching shit" (TM Sage Hana) perception provides excellent cover.
The same could be said of the UN. On the one hand, it seems like a large and ineffective bureaucratic institution that simply wastes tons of money. On the other hand, it serves a very different set of purposes altogether from what the public understands, which it is highly effective at, namely, promoting the man-made global warming ruse and systematically executing many of the critical steps needed to implement one-world government vis a vis Agenda 21 and all of its related offshoots, including the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Agenda. (See Patrick Wood's, Technocracy and other books for more on this.)
The CIA most certainly does not suck at everything, nor does the UN. They suck at serving We the People, but excel at serving others.
I worry that this is becoming an unfalsifiable position. If they do their stated job, then they're highly effective. If they don't do their stated job, then they weren't actually supposed to be doing *that* job.
I'm not trolling you. It's clear that there's some level of global coordination here, but I worry when we try to make everything fit into the puzzle. People just aren't that smart, especially people in government. There has to be room for mistakes and coincidences.
No worries. There is enormous scope for mistakes and coincidences. I can only share where extensive booking reading and other research has led me. I will always want to hear other perspectives, especially if the research is comparable (or better) and leads to different findings. But speculation without commensurate research and compelling arguments is always going to be, well, less compelling for me. Atb.
Admittedly, I'm not a researcher. However, I do know that humans have a deep desire to connect things that in reality may be separate. Our brains are just wired that way. I think it's important to guard against this tendency.