I worry that this is becoming an unfalsifiable position. If they do their stated job, then they're highly effective. If they don't do their stated job, then they weren't actually supposed to be doing *that* job.
I'm not trolling you. It's clear that there's some level of global coordination here, but I worry when we try to make everything…
I worry that this is becoming an unfalsifiable position. If they do their stated job, then they're highly effective. If they don't do their stated job, then they weren't actually supposed to be doing *that* job.
I'm not trolling you. It's clear that there's some level of global coordination here, but I worry when we try to make everything fit into the puzzle. People just aren't that smart, especially people in government. There has to be room for mistakes and coincidences.
No worries. There is enormous scope for mistakes and coincidences. I can only share where extensive booking reading and other research has led me. I will always want to hear other perspectives, especially if the research is comparable (or better) and leads to different findings. But speculation without commensurate research and compelling arguments is always going to be, well, less compelling for me. Atb.
Admittedly, I'm not a researcher. However, I do know that humans have a deep desire to connect things that in reality may be separate. Our brains are just wired that way. I think it's important to guard against this tendency.
I worry that this is becoming an unfalsifiable position. If they do their stated job, then they're highly effective. If they don't do their stated job, then they weren't actually supposed to be doing *that* job.
I'm not trolling you. It's clear that there's some level of global coordination here, but I worry when we try to make everything fit into the puzzle. People just aren't that smart, especially people in government. There has to be room for mistakes and coincidences.
No worries. There is enormous scope for mistakes and coincidences. I can only share where extensive booking reading and other research has led me. I will always want to hear other perspectives, especially if the research is comparable (or better) and leads to different findings. But speculation without commensurate research and compelling arguments is always going to be, well, less compelling for me. Atb.
Admittedly, I'm not a researcher. However, I do know that humans have a deep desire to connect things that in reality may be separate. Our brains are just wired that way. I think it's important to guard against this tendency.