188 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I knew this would likely not be a popular post given Naomi's newfound popularity with the health freedom "movement" that's not really a movement. In case you missed it, I acknowledge her recent change as a positive, more than once and attribute it to her likely "seeing" things in a piece I found rather silly. I recognize we're all advancing on our own terms and pace. If I question her intentions now, it's because of her past, and because intentions are hard to know. A recent satire on Dr. Malone's obsessive desire to control his own public image through lawfare and unintentionally hilarious posts on Substack, was not popular either as I suspected. I do not do "tribes" and "teams' and "our side" on any subjects. Especially with public figures, many often pushed into that role. While considering potential "backlash" has kept me from publishing works in the past, those days are over. I cannot be free to write what I see with those chains.

Expand full comment

GC, I don’t feel worthy of responding to your reply to all.

All I can say is it feels, no it seems, like all of these new age experts pretending to be on the side of medical freedom or of seeing the truth, are going to be the next wave of tyrants, or at least they are jockeying for positions…

You are such a fine writer, I am a man of simple words, but took an excellent class in writing when I was in college, you bring back memories of the things I was trying to be taught, that is a compliment my friend, those things I have never thought of until reading you. I believe I understand them now a bit better, thanks

Expand full comment

Thanks Devo.

Expand full comment

GC, you just blew me away.

Every sentence packed a punch.

Do you know, she had a column recently how she actually listened to Trump speak, and was okay with it?

I was a liberal (rent control) when I was in college. I hated the feminists though when I went into the workforce...they brainwashed an entire generation of women...and made men and women think they could have sex and not be effected/affected....women cannot do this. Men can.

I never could stand my peer group.

Thanks for stating what the needle was, and the damage done.

Expand full comment

Can you elaborate more on Dr. Malone inside story? I read few articles from Sage Hana about his strange shift and I know that he changed positions in middle of 2021. Nevertheless, I really like his presentation on fifth - generation warfare and most of his insights are very good and truthful.

Expand full comment

I don't have the inside scoop. His lawfare against others seemed suspicious, beyond the petty and absurd. George Webb has some interesting stuff. Click archive and search "malone"

Expand full comment

I also don't understand that. Honestly, I am more on Sage Hana side, even when sometime is childish the reporting is not fake. Also this tweet is mystery for me, Mike Yeadon was there since beginning and always on good side. https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1698388717243666710

Expand full comment

Malone trying to take down Yeadon? Oof. It's no contest, on integrity, on bravery, courage, on not clout chasing and gas lighting. Malone is a child with horses.

Expand full comment

Mike Yeadon is the Real Deal

Malone is more ‘integrity is important and once you can fake that you have it made ‘

Expand full comment

"...considering the large population in India that remain to be vaccinated..." Tells you everything, Malone's got Willie Sutton vibes and just going where the money is.

Expand full comment

Sorry, forgot the link...

https://georgewebb.substack.com/

Expand full comment

I give Naomi the benefit of doubt as I would most people who start to question their previous conceived notions. We will see where she goes from here. Good insights as usual!

Expand full comment

Keep being you.

Expand full comment

You are one of the few substacks that I always read the newest post. Love your writing, and keep up the great work, GC

Expand full comment

I replied to Wolf directly on her Substack, that, if her husband was diagnosed with prostate cancer, she would learn that her fellow feminists made sure that breast cancer receives many times more taxpayer funding than prostate cancer. No reply back, but I did get a few "likes" for that comment.

Expand full comment

Question:

“please forgive the reflexive unthinking reverence.”

Did you mean, please forgive the LACK OF reflexive unthinking reverence?

Expand full comment

Thank you for elaborately and poignantly stating what I was sensing of late. She has lost one paid subscriber today.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 15, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You are so right. I was starting to give Naomi a pass when she first started talking about the vax harms done to pregnant women and unborn/newly born babies... and then I realized I was being totally manipulated. The woman is a complete schill.

Expand full comment