Excellent. I'm watching a lot of people - like Cruella - bury themselves right now. RFK JR too. I don't think they grok where we are. Redux isn't working. No one (paying attention) is interested. Thanks.
Excellent. I'm watching a lot of people - like Cruella - bury themselves right now. RFK JR too. I don't think they grok where we are. Redux isn't working. No one (paying attention) is interested. Thanks.
No - I was referring to that tweet and his conversation, pre conflict, with Jimmy Dore also defending Israel and less than generous comments on Palestians. I think he's trying to avoid making things worse by avoiding the subject, which won't work. Everyone in the political realm must have taken an oath. I suspect they are surprised by how many of us are no longer falling in line.
I think Cynthia McKinney said there was an oath they had to take. And when she refused, they pushed her out and put in that guy who thinks Guam is going to tip over.
I don't know whether they have to take an oath about Israel; they do have to swear to uphold the US Constitution. Sen. Tom Massie (R-KY) revealed to Tucker that everyone who gets a seat in Congress gets a "handler" from AIPAC to keep them in line w/ Israel. Massie said he's the only one that has refused to meet w/ "his" person from AIPAC.
In one of Charles Eisenstein's recent posts (Charles is a part of the RFK, Jr. campaign), he included a Tweet showing RFK, Jr. making comments about Israel. He said -- with his face hanging out -- that Israel is essential to American security in the Middle East. Stunning. I left a comment. Here is a portion of it, which Charles liked:
"How utterly absurd. Does RFK, Jr. mean to say that the United States is incapable of having secure, respectful, non-violent relations with the countries of the Middle East without Israel??? If that's what he means..? Among the myriad problems with that statement, what message does that convey to the people of those countries??? Just ridiculous. Utterly ridiculous."
Of course, the reality is that since its inception, that political construct courtesy of Balfour and Rothschild has brought nothing but insecurity, suffering, death, heartache, and resentment to the region. If there had been the slightest sliver of an inclination to vote for RFK, Jr. should he be on the ballot, that statement right there sealed it -- no effing way.
They all have to kneel before zod. Sad but if RFK jr.who is one of the most sensible candidates since Ron Paul can't get this right then what more proof do people need that Israel runs the US government and controls its politicians?
Now that he's slated to be HHS Sec. he can focus on what he does best and not have to concern himself w/ Israel (if it's possible to be in the fed gov't and not have to work for Isr.)
Yep. Compare RFKjr's stance with his FORMER campaign manager, Dennis Kucinich (often very critical of Israel/Gaza policy and actions). His post from today, tho not anti Israel, basically seeks to defund the WarBeast. His motives are to be questioned as well, but, it differs: https://denniskucinich.substack.com/p/how-to-stop-the-wars?
I didn't know he was 'former' which is what surprised me about RFK jr'srecent tweets. Anti-war was the best thing about Dennis and he should have kept him on his campaign for that alone. Now he'll quickly self-immolate like Desantis did. Maybe he was always just another false choice.
It happened a few weeks back around RFKs tweet, so perhaps a resignation or firing or none of the above but the timing makes it seem so. Read somewhere that an exCIA in-law of K replaced him? Dunno how true that part is.
Excellent. I'm watching a lot of people - like Cruella - bury themselves right now. RFK JR too. I don't think they grok where we are. Redux isn't working. No one (paying attention) is interested. Thanks.
Did RFK Jr. pull a Glenn Beck? I saw his tweet the day after the false flag. No bueno. Any links to recent performances?
Pretty much. He disappointed me bigtime w/ his "stand w/ Israel" comments the day after the false flag. Everyone is infected it seems.
No - I was referring to that tweet and his conversation, pre conflict, with Jimmy Dore also defending Israel and less than generous comments on Palestians. I think he's trying to avoid making things worse by avoiding the subject, which won't work. Everyone in the political realm must have taken an oath. I suspect they are surprised by how many of us are no longer falling in line.
I think Cynthia McKinney said there was an oath they had to take. And when she refused, they pushed her out and put in that guy who thinks Guam is going to tip over.
I don't know whether they have to take an oath about Israel; they do have to swear to uphold the US Constitution. Sen. Tom Massie (R-KY) revealed to Tucker that everyone who gets a seat in Congress gets a "handler" from AIPAC to keep them in line w/ Israel. Massie said he's the only one that has refused to meet w/ "his" person from AIPAC.
In one of Charles Eisenstein's recent posts (Charles is a part of the RFK, Jr. campaign), he included a Tweet showing RFK, Jr. making comments about Israel. He said -- with his face hanging out -- that Israel is essential to American security in the Middle East. Stunning. I left a comment. Here is a portion of it, which Charles liked:
"How utterly absurd. Does RFK, Jr. mean to say that the United States is incapable of having secure, respectful, non-violent relations with the countries of the Middle East without Israel??? If that's what he means..? Among the myriad problems with that statement, what message does that convey to the people of those countries??? Just ridiculous. Utterly ridiculous."
Of course, the reality is that since its inception, that political construct courtesy of Balfour and Rothschild has brought nothing but insecurity, suffering, death, heartache, and resentment to the region. If there had been the slightest sliver of an inclination to vote for RFK, Jr. should he be on the ballot, that statement right there sealed it -- no effing way.
They all have to kneel before zod. Sad but if RFK jr.who is one of the most sensible candidates since Ron Paul can't get this right then what more proof do people need that Israel runs the US government and controls its politicians?
Now that he's slated to be HHS Sec. he can focus on what he does best and not have to concern himself w/ Israel (if it's possible to be in the fed gov't and not have to work for Isr.)
No effing way for me too!
Yep. Compare RFKjr's stance with his FORMER campaign manager, Dennis Kucinich (often very critical of Israel/Gaza policy and actions). His post from today, tho not anti Israel, basically seeks to defund the WarBeast. His motives are to be questioned as well, but, it differs: https://denniskucinich.substack.com/p/how-to-stop-the-wars?
I didn't know he was 'former' which is what surprised me about RFK jr'srecent tweets. Anti-war was the best thing about Dennis and he should have kept him on his campaign for that alone. Now he'll quickly self-immolate like Desantis did. Maybe he was always just another false choice.
It happened a few weeks back around RFKs tweet, so perhaps a resignation or firing or none of the above but the timing makes it seem so. Read somewhere that an exCIA in-law of K replaced him? Dunno how true that part is.
It's true.