In one of Charles Eisenstein's recent posts (Charles is a part of the RFK, Jr. campaign), he included a Tweet showing RFK, Jr. making comments about Israel. He said -- with his face hanging out -- that Israel is essential to American security in the Middle East. Stunning. I left a comment. Here is a portion of it, which Charles liked:
In one of Charles Eisenstein's recent posts (Charles is a part of the RFK, Jr. campaign), he included a Tweet showing RFK, Jr. making comments about Israel. He said -- with his face hanging out -- that Israel is essential to American security in the Middle East. Stunning. I left a comment. Here is a portion of it, which Charles liked:
"How utterly absurd. Does RFK, Jr. mean to say that the United States is incapable of having secure, respectful, non-violent relations with the countries of the Middle East without Israel??? If that's what he means..? Among the myriad problems with that statement, what message does that convey to the people of those countries??? Just ridiculous. Utterly ridiculous."
Of course, the reality is that since its inception, that political construct courtesy of Balfour and Rothschild has brought nothing but insecurity, suffering, death, heartache, and resentment to the region. If there had been the slightest sliver of an inclination to vote for RFK, Jr. should he be on the ballot, that statement right there sealed it -- no effing way.
They all have to kneel before zod. Sad but if RFK jr.who is one of the most sensible candidates since Ron Paul can't get this right then what more proof do people need that Israel runs the US government and controls its politicians?
Now that he's slated to be HHS Sec. he can focus on what he does best and not have to concern himself w/ Israel (if it's possible to be in the fed gov't and not have to work for Isr.)
In one of Charles Eisenstein's recent posts (Charles is a part of the RFK, Jr. campaign), he included a Tweet showing RFK, Jr. making comments about Israel. He said -- with his face hanging out -- that Israel is essential to American security in the Middle East. Stunning. I left a comment. Here is a portion of it, which Charles liked:
"How utterly absurd. Does RFK, Jr. mean to say that the United States is incapable of having secure, respectful, non-violent relations with the countries of the Middle East without Israel??? If that's what he means..? Among the myriad problems with that statement, what message does that convey to the people of those countries??? Just ridiculous. Utterly ridiculous."
Of course, the reality is that since its inception, that political construct courtesy of Balfour and Rothschild has brought nothing but insecurity, suffering, death, heartache, and resentment to the region. If there had been the slightest sliver of an inclination to vote for RFK, Jr. should he be on the ballot, that statement right there sealed it -- no effing way.
They all have to kneel before zod. Sad but if RFK jr.who is one of the most sensible candidates since Ron Paul can't get this right then what more proof do people need that Israel runs the US government and controls its politicians?
Now that he's slated to be HHS Sec. he can focus on what he does best and not have to concern himself w/ Israel (if it's possible to be in the fed gov't and not have to work for Isr.)
No effing way for me too!