She is. And she's no fan of Desmet's theory to put it mildly.
I don't think CBDC's will work in the end. The control grid is too ambitious and it all smells desperate to me. Biden's rhetoric another example.
Funny - just talked about that to my partner - 'what about Mexico'?
Three days ago Alex Jones: "Biden is going to try to antagonize Trump supporters into committing acts of violence for the next 71 days until the election. Don't fall for it."
Me: Pffff.
Last night me: Oh shit, Alex Jones was right again.
Honestly, since South of the Border is emptying out into El Norte, at some point we can probably just go help ourselves and start fresh down there.ЁЯШВ
maybe worth noting, when I reposted a video on my stack of CAF and Breggin discussing Desmet's book, and I noted that Malone had a lot to with with bringing attention to it - Malone commented and said the Breggin was 'wrong' and 'misunderstood.' I thought, well, that's your opinion and okay, but Breggin was years ahead of you in seeing the global predators, so maybe... he's not.
It's an excellent book. I don't have a conclusion about Malone and Kirsch re their intentions. I've been open and appreciate the attention and work they've done. Though I do notice how it is they are both vaxxed and have managed to sit at the top of the many many people out ringing the alarm. (Maybe because they are a better bridge to the vaxxed, maybe because they work harder?) I also am aware that neither has been willing to say, this was all intentional. And honestly at this point, don't know they could hold that opinion in integrity. But maybe, it's just too scary a leap. Don't know.
I detest purity tests and don't like using the vax as one. But it is a telling indicator of who knew what and when about corporate state collusion and the obvious psyops. Most of these guys knew nothing until last year, which says a lot. They do appear to work hard and be great at selling themselves and people have been desperate for voices to run toward for often simple yet satisfying answers. None of these guys have come out to say it was intentional, and that's because they lack the integrity and guts of someone like Jon Rappoport, the Godfather of leaving the matrix. Most of these guys live in a bygone era, and still hope the New York Times will like them one day.
going to elaborate on the data-sharing with a real world example.
we just changed car insurance companies. i have a vehicle with that fancy starlink/remote start thing. so the car manufacturer and starlink both know where the car is at all times. manufacturer knows the tire pressure (but you have to call to schedule any recall service to make sure that they have parts in stock - well that's dumb too). the car insurance company is giving us a discount for carrying around a GPS gadget thing (we have a new teenage male driver so every discount helps). why can't the insurance company bully er collaborate with starlink to get that data instead of giving us this thing to add to the car? ideally, i would have that data and just grant them access but it's crazy that they aren't doing useful data-sharing.
remember the old sprint commercials? "the web site isn't the store site" one? still mostly true.
Wow. It's crazy how data controls so much these days and corporations use it against their own customers via surveillance capitalism. I don't miss owning a car. If I did it'd be one where nobody knows where I am ever. 71' Land Cruiser or something lol.
we live rural but we usually have a 5 mile radius of driving - it's not that things are far but there's no easy way to traverse without a vehicle and car/truck is most efficient time-wise. the starlink stuff is kind of cool -- i could use it to slap a curfew on the car and a maximum speed when the teen is out, all from the palm of my hand. so right there, a parent should see great insurance discounts. but no data-sharing <eye roll>, no easy discounts.
nearby we have "the long bridge". a local standing challenge is who can go for the longest time periods without having to cross the bridge. husband's record is about 18 months. the corporate trackers will be very bored scanning our habits. home depot, grocery, home depot, home depot, gas, school.
I too just bought a car with starlink. It's free for 3 months I think. I know instinctively that I do not want to continue paying for it after that; you have given me more reason not to. The car insurance racket, being a player in this also angers me.
I will reluctantly admit that in sub freezing temperatures after a snowfall, the 10 min remote start is handy to get the car warm enough to make cleaning it off with less hassle. Especially the underlying ice layer that we typically get beneath the inches of snow.
The sales agent pointed that out to me, but since I have a garage, no sale. I don't plan on being in northern climes. There are reasons that a lot of tech options make sense and even though I hate most of it because it's all about surveillance I accept its tradeoffs.
She is. And she's no fan of Desmet's theory to put it mildly.
I don't think CBDC's will work in the end. The control grid is too ambitious and it all smells desperate to me. Biden's rhetoric another example.
Funny - just talked about that to my partner - 'what about Mexico'?
Three days ago Alex Jones: "Biden is going to try to antagonize Trump supporters into committing acts of violence for the next 71 days until the election. Don't fall for it."
Me: Pffff.
Last night me: Oh shit, Alex Jones was right again.
don't you hate when you find yourself saying that? been there.ЁЯШК
Put a dollar in the jar
There's ten warehouses of full jars by now. ЁЯдг
ЁЯОпЁЯТЮ
Honestly, since South of the Border is emptying out into El Norte, at some point we can probably just go help ourselves and start fresh down there.ЁЯШВ
ЁЯШК
Too many megacorps want to control their own datasets (based on our data). They don't get along.
HereтАЩs a rebuttal to desmet:
https://jermwarfare.com/tnt/peter-breggin-mass-formation
Thanks for that. The full review by Breggin is worth the read.
https://www.americaoutloud.com/mattias-desmet-mass-hypnosis-expert-or-trojan-horse-the-full-story/
maybe worth noting, when I reposted a video on my stack of CAF and Breggin discussing Desmet's book, and I noted that Malone had a lot to with with bringing attention to it - Malone commented and said the Breggin was 'wrong' and 'misunderstood.' I thought, well, that's your opinion and okay, but Breggin was years ahead of you in seeing the global predators, so maybe... he's not.
Precisely. He and Kirsch were still in line for the jabs when Breggin's book was published: COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey
It's an excellent book. I don't have a conclusion about Malone and Kirsch re their intentions. I've been open and appreciate the attention and work they've done. Though I do notice how it is they are both vaxxed and have managed to sit at the top of the many many people out ringing the alarm. (Maybe because they are a better bridge to the vaxxed, maybe because they work harder?) I also am aware that neither has been willing to say, this was all intentional. And honestly at this point, don't know they could hold that opinion in integrity. But maybe, it's just too scary a leap. Don't know.
I detest purity tests and don't like using the vax as one. But it is a telling indicator of who knew what and when about corporate state collusion and the obvious psyops. Most of these guys knew nothing until last year, which says a lot. They do appear to work hard and be great at selling themselves and people have been desperate for voices to run toward for often simple yet satisfying answers. None of these guys have come out to say it was intentional, and that's because they lack the integrity and guts of someone like Jon Rappoport, the Godfather of leaving the matrix. Most of these guys live in a bygone era, and still hope the New York Times will like them one day.
going to elaborate on the data-sharing with a real world example.
we just changed car insurance companies. i have a vehicle with that fancy starlink/remote start thing. so the car manufacturer and starlink both know where the car is at all times. manufacturer knows the tire pressure (but you have to call to schedule any recall service to make sure that they have parts in stock - well that's dumb too). the car insurance company is giving us a discount for carrying around a GPS gadget thing (we have a new teenage male driver so every discount helps). why can't the insurance company bully er collaborate with starlink to get that data instead of giving us this thing to add to the car? ideally, i would have that data and just grant them access but it's crazy that they aren't doing useful data-sharing.
remember the old sprint commercials? "the web site isn't the store site" one? still mostly true.
Wow. It's crazy how data controls so much these days and corporations use it against their own customers via surveillance capitalism. I don't miss owning a car. If I did it'd be one where nobody knows where I am ever. 71' Land Cruiser or something lol.
we live rural but we usually have a 5 mile radius of driving - it's not that things are far but there's no easy way to traverse without a vehicle and car/truck is most efficient time-wise. the starlink stuff is kind of cool -- i could use it to slap a curfew on the car and a maximum speed when the teen is out, all from the palm of my hand. so right there, a parent should see great insurance discounts. but no data-sharing <eye roll>, no easy discounts.
nearby we have "the long bridge". a local standing challenge is who can go for the longest time periods without having to cross the bridge. husband's record is about 18 months. the corporate trackers will be very bored scanning our habits. home depot, grocery, home depot, home depot, gas, school.
I too just bought a car with starlink. It's free for 3 months I think. I know instinctively that I do not want to continue paying for it after that; you have given me more reason not to. The car insurance racket, being a player in this also angers me.
I will reluctantly admit that in sub freezing temperatures after a snowfall, the 10 min remote start is handy to get the car warm enough to make cleaning it off with less hassle. Especially the underlying ice layer that we typically get beneath the inches of snow.
The sales agent pointed that out to me, but since I have a garage, no sale. I don't plan on being in northern climes. There are reasons that a lot of tech options make sense and even though I hate most of it because it's all about surveillance I accept its tradeoffs.
thanks