aspects of both germ theory and terrain theory are correct and are not mutually exclusive, this is where science fails, its not one or the other its both
aspects of both germ theory and terrain theory are correct and are not mutually exclusive, this is where science fails, its not one or the other its both
me too! I use to think a lot of dr. cowan i have his books. I see him speak and im thinking "you are not helping us dude!" I have had to rescue a few of his and kaufmanns followers because they didn't think "it" existed. No plan, no supplies! Im schlepping my stuff (or overnighting) to them because i still love them and want them around. Today's superpower is being able to change your mind with new information and experiences. My Dad who loved a good debate taught me two things when someone tells you something 1) Is that true? 2) Cui Bono - who benefits from me believing what they say is true.
"It" doesn't exist. That's not what they, or anyone, needs to be preparing for nor stocking supplies for, although many would be the same supplies regardless of the causes, plural, because it is plural. What amazes me that on this forum so many, if not all, that read Jon Rappoport STILL believe in viral theory. And Dr Cowan isn't there to help "us", he's there to inform anyone that wants to listen of the truth as it currently stands. As he, and all of the others' so called "followers", which is a very overused and now tainted descriptive, has always stated, there is no "it" that makes people ill. Never has been, never will be. If one can still not see how biology, life, and the energies function after hundreds of hours of videos and historical references, documents and scientific, real science, articles then there is a real problem with that person's critical thinking processes and/or comprehension. If your acquaintances interpreted Cowan or Kaufman's revelations to mean they will never get ill then they have a comprehension issue as that is not what any of them has stated, ever and quite the opposite, actually. And your dad had good advice and when you apply those two questions to Cowan and Kaufman and Lanka,, etc, it shows exactly just how their information and intent is true and honorable.
I do listen to both of them and what they say doesnтАЩt resonate with me. Sorry but my biggest issue is I feel like they are a distraction to the fight we are in right now. Can we debate that after we get past this insanity. Cowan I will give the benefit of the doubt Kaufman just the way he went viral makes him suspect IMHO. I donтАЩt claim to know everything n I learn something new everyday, they just donтАЩt feel like they are helping us maintain r health freedom.
Maintain health freedom? There is no freedom to maintain. I respect your opinions, however. When someone states that exposing the basis of fraud that goes back two centuries and has impacted every single person's life during that time and for years to come is a distraction, I have to wonder just what they think IS the fight? There is no debate to have on the issues they bring up. Science isn't debatable, it's a study that you use a well defined protocol with to prove (or disprove) a hypothesis. If something cannot be proven, and repeated, the it is not a scientific fact. The truth is that a very long time ago medical freedom was hijacked by the Rockefellers, crushing chiropractic and homeopathy which had excellent results, in favor of the ultra money making current medical model using petroleum based (toxic) drugs, surgery, and other toxic treatments. This creates lifelong customers or dead ones, helping to further the population control agenda. The insanity you speak of is directly a result of this exact fraud and it was planned that way. That is why this is important. Some do not see the connection but they must not have actually studied the complete history or choose to remain in denial. Unless and until the entire virus fraud is totally exposed and the majority see it for the basis of the control and usurping of liberties, we will not just regain medical freedom, we will become complete and utterly controlled slaves and we are nearly there. Kaufman did not go viral because of anything he chose or planned. It's just that his calm, clear presentation of facts he had uncovered and studied were revealed via several platforms and lucky for all that happened when it did. He is certainly not the only one. Dr Cowan is more of a laid back, and much older and more experienced man with a different method of presenting the information he thinks is important. He has continued to evolve in his thinking over the years and is still learning and is the first to admit he doesn't know it all. He does try to help people understand they are indeed powerful and that their health is in their own hands and how to achieve that. Dr Kaufman does the same but in a different way and is a bit behind Cowan in some areas. To be skeptical is good, to not vet a person to see if they may have ulterior motives and/or associations that would make them suspect is not helpful at all. One can become too jaded and suspicious and throw out the baby with the bathwater. Study what both Cowan and Kaufman say and present for yourself. See if you can poke holes in any of it. See if you can find any associations for either of them that would make their motives suspect. I can assure you that you will come up empty. I do not blindly accept what anyone says without careful consideration and research. I have found over the decades that sometimes information does not "resonate" with me at that time, that I don't quite "get " it, so I shelve it and at a later date, maybe months or even years later it makes perfect sense. We are all at different junctions of learning. While distractions are all around us at every moment, and these forums topics are often just that, the messages that Cowan, Kaufman, Lanka, Baileys, Stone, and others are providing are exactly the path needed to cause the lower layers of the house of cards to fall. One cannot start at the top of the tower and expect it to collapse, it's much too big. The bottom has to be knocked out and the rest will fall rather quickly. Keep an open mind.
Oh IтАЩm familiar with all that. But if IтАЩm trying to get someone to open up a little to things arenтАЩt like they appear. Saying there is no virus shuts down all conversation.
Science is not nuanced, humans are. When taken in context and to the full detail, everything thus far that Cowan and Kaufman and Lanka have stated is provable and accurate including the parts where they state "possibly", "maybe", etc. The fact stands that science has never, to date, been able to prove the existence of ANY pathogenic contagious virus particle. Ever. Terrain theory does not state that there are no "germs" that may cause illness and people like to use that as a basis for rejecting actual science.
aspects of both germ theory and terrain theory are correct and are not mutually exclusive, this is where science fails, its not one or the other its both
Those who have embraced cowan's nonsense can't see the nuance. I live amongst many of them.
me too! I use to think a lot of dr. cowan i have his books. I see him speak and im thinking "you are not helping us dude!" I have had to rescue a few of his and kaufmanns followers because they didn't think "it" existed. No plan, no supplies! Im schlepping my stuff (or overnighting) to them because i still love them and want them around. Today's superpower is being able to change your mind with new information and experiences. My Dad who loved a good debate taught me two things when someone tells you something 1) Is that true? 2) Cui Bono - who benefits from me believing what they say is true.
"It" doesn't exist. That's not what they, or anyone, needs to be preparing for nor stocking supplies for, although many would be the same supplies regardless of the causes, plural, because it is plural. What amazes me that on this forum so many, if not all, that read Jon Rappoport STILL believe in viral theory. And Dr Cowan isn't there to help "us", he's there to inform anyone that wants to listen of the truth as it currently stands. As he, and all of the others' so called "followers", which is a very overused and now tainted descriptive, has always stated, there is no "it" that makes people ill. Never has been, never will be. If one can still not see how biology, life, and the energies function after hundreds of hours of videos and historical references, documents and scientific, real science, articles then there is a real problem with that person's critical thinking processes and/or comprehension. If your acquaintances interpreted Cowan or Kaufman's revelations to mean they will never get ill then they have a comprehension issue as that is not what any of them has stated, ever and quite the opposite, actually. And your dad had good advice and when you apply those two questions to Cowan and Kaufman and Lanka,, etc, it shows exactly just how their information and intent is true and honorable.
I do listen to both of them and what they say doesnтАЩt resonate with me. Sorry but my biggest issue is I feel like they are a distraction to the fight we are in right now. Can we debate that after we get past this insanity. Cowan I will give the benefit of the doubt Kaufman just the way he went viral makes him suspect IMHO. I donтАЩt claim to know everything n I learn something new everyday, they just donтАЩt feel like they are helping us maintain r health freedom.
Maintain health freedom? There is no freedom to maintain. I respect your opinions, however. When someone states that exposing the basis of fraud that goes back two centuries and has impacted every single person's life during that time and for years to come is a distraction, I have to wonder just what they think IS the fight? There is no debate to have on the issues they bring up. Science isn't debatable, it's a study that you use a well defined protocol with to prove (or disprove) a hypothesis. If something cannot be proven, and repeated, the it is not a scientific fact. The truth is that a very long time ago medical freedom was hijacked by the Rockefellers, crushing chiropractic and homeopathy which had excellent results, in favor of the ultra money making current medical model using petroleum based (toxic) drugs, surgery, and other toxic treatments. This creates lifelong customers or dead ones, helping to further the population control agenda. The insanity you speak of is directly a result of this exact fraud and it was planned that way. That is why this is important. Some do not see the connection but they must not have actually studied the complete history or choose to remain in denial. Unless and until the entire virus fraud is totally exposed and the majority see it for the basis of the control and usurping of liberties, we will not just regain medical freedom, we will become complete and utterly controlled slaves and we are nearly there. Kaufman did not go viral because of anything he chose or planned. It's just that his calm, clear presentation of facts he had uncovered and studied were revealed via several platforms and lucky for all that happened when it did. He is certainly not the only one. Dr Cowan is more of a laid back, and much older and more experienced man with a different method of presenting the information he thinks is important. He has continued to evolve in his thinking over the years and is still learning and is the first to admit he doesn't know it all. He does try to help people understand they are indeed powerful and that their health is in their own hands and how to achieve that. Dr Kaufman does the same but in a different way and is a bit behind Cowan in some areas. To be skeptical is good, to not vet a person to see if they may have ulterior motives and/or associations that would make them suspect is not helpful at all. One can become too jaded and suspicious and throw out the baby with the bathwater. Study what both Cowan and Kaufman say and present for yourself. See if you can poke holes in any of it. See if you can find any associations for either of them that would make their motives suspect. I can assure you that you will come up empty. I do not blindly accept what anyone says without careful consideration and research. I have found over the decades that sometimes information does not "resonate" with me at that time, that I don't quite "get " it, so I shelve it and at a later date, maybe months or even years later it makes perfect sense. We are all at different junctions of learning. While distractions are all around us at every moment, and these forums topics are often just that, the messages that Cowan, Kaufman, Lanka, Baileys, Stone, and others are providing are exactly the path needed to cause the lower layers of the house of cards to fall. One cannot start at the top of the tower and expect it to collapse, it's much too big. The bottom has to be knocked out and the rest will fall rather quickly. Keep an open mind.
Oh IтАЩm familiar with all that. But if IтАЩm trying to get someone to open up a little to things arenтАЩt like they appear. Saying there is no virus shuts down all conversation.
Mary, Good advice from your dad!
I wasn't privileged to have a present dad (he did what he knew best), but I'll pass that word of wisdom to my son. Thank you!
Agree. It is all black or white no nuance.
Science is not nuanced, humans are. When taken in context and to the full detail, everything thus far that Cowan and Kaufman and Lanka have stated is provable and accurate including the parts where they state "possibly", "maybe", etc. The fact stands that science has never, to date, been able to prove the existence of ANY pathogenic contagious virus particle. Ever. Terrain theory does not state that there are no "germs" that may cause illness and people like to use that as a basis for rejecting actual science.