First and foremost, I would like to apologize for inserting links; I do that in order to save space and out of respect for those, who are not necessarily interested in my thoughts.
Please, also provide your links, whenever applicable, in my comment sections to your excellent articles!
Although I can only hope to be correct every once in a …
First and foremost, I would like to apologize for inserting links; I do that in order to save space and out of respect for those, who are not necessarily interested in my thoughts.
Please, also provide your links, whenever applicable, in my comment sections to your excellent articles!
Although I can only hope to be correct every once in a while, I am happy, if my ideas inspire others to make decisions on their own and take responsibility for them. Nobody has to agree with me! :)
It's always nice to read my fellow substacker, who is also whom Zamyatin called the “madmen, hermits, heretics, dreamers, rebels, and skeptics." (Zamyatin's "We" is recommended reading for those, who have read 1984 too many times)
On Kirsch, as on most other things, the author and I totally agree. He will never meet the conditions for an authentic debate:
First and foremost, I would like to apologize for inserting links; I do that in order to save space and out of respect for those, who are not necessarily interested in my thoughts.
Please, also provide your links, whenever applicable, in my comment sections to your excellent articles!
Although I can only hope to be correct every once in a while, I am happy, if my ideas inspire others to make decisions on their own and take responsibility for them. Nobody has to agree with me! :)
It's always nice to read my fellow substacker, who is also whom Zamyatin called the “madmen, hermits, heretics, dreamers, rebels, and skeptics." (Zamyatin's "We" is recommended reading for those, who have read 1984 too many times)
On Kirsch, as on most other things, the author and I totally agree. He will never meet the conditions for an authentic debate:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/steve-kirsch-is-challenging-again
As for "mass formation," in my experience, the explanation is simple and it doesn't require a book to describe it on a larger scale and a wider scope:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/mass-formation-is-misrepresented
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-most-powerful-mode-of-manipulation
As for all the abortive debates, as far as I can see (and agree with the author repeatedly), they function as red herrings:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-right-and-who-is-wrong