Tucker interviewed Amaryllis Kennedy, former CIA, former campaign chief for RFK Jr, and now Trump supporter.
She discussed in detail the proliferation of this technology, the ease of delivery, and the bloodless damage to nations. The grids are down and the population slowly dies off. No nuclear fallout. No damage to y…
Tucker interviewed Amaryllis Kennedy, former CIA, former campaign chief for RFK Jr, and now Trump supporter.
She discussed in detail the proliferation of this technology, the ease of delivery, and the bloodless damage to nations. The grids are down and the population slowly dies off. No nuclear fallout. No damage to your own nation; the enemy is instantly destabilized. This is the ideal weapon of choice for evil minds.
Certainly a big possiblity. It overlaps with the one-way nuke strike (EMPs first to eliminate a response) and solar radiation activity which would result in the same outcome, or similar.
I would think EMPs between the US, Russia and/or China would be a variation of MAD (mutually assured destruction). All three would have the ability to "see" the EMP attack coming and also to strike back afterwards.
Did I miss EMPs here?
Tucker interviewed Amaryllis Kennedy, former CIA, former campaign chief for RFK Jr, and now Trump supporter.
She discussed in detail the proliferation of this technology, the ease of delivery, and the bloodless damage to nations. The grids are down and the population slowly dies off. No nuclear fallout. No damage to your own nation; the enemy is instantly destabilized. This is the ideal weapon of choice for evil minds.
Certainly a big possiblity. It overlaps with the one-way nuke strike (EMPs first to eliminate a response) and solar radiation activity which would result in the same outcome, or similar.
I would think EMPs between the US, Russia and/or China would be a variation of MAD (mutually assured destruction). All three would have the ability to "see" the EMP attack coming and also to strike back afterwards.