Double Chubby Checker

A new twist that debunks the official "lone gunman" story, again.

Unless Crooks brought two rifles with him and managed to switch guns in those two seconds between shots three and four(HA!), new audio reveals that two people shot into the MAGA crowd on the evening of July 13.

It’s 98% definitive.

In my weekend post, I did nearly three hours of audio analysis using what was probably the microphone at the podium where President Trump stood. It still revealed three different firearms being shot that day (maybe four with the last shot heard ten seconds after all the rest), however, I wasn’t able to accurately attribute the correct rounds via audio signature to the different rifles.

The audio signatures from the podium microphone included shots and echoes which looked like this…

The first five shots.

Given those signatures, I concluded the first five shots came from one rifle in a single location. New audio suggests that the first three shots differ greatly from shots 4-8.

This indicates that we need a second shooter stationed at or near the same line of sight as Crooks to carry out shots 4-8 to account for bullet trajectories and the distance between shots and echoes that match so closely (4-5) to the first three rounds.

This still doesn’t prove Crooks fired any shots. Until video proof emerges of him firing his AR weapon, most skeptics will not be satisfied that he did any shooting that day (nevermind those who think it was all a staged hoax with crisis actors and fake blood), but let’s forget about wild imaginations for now and stick with the simple task of debunking the official narrative using the new audio evidence.

What explains the audio discrepancy between the Right Side Broadcasting wide-angle camera (probably connected to Trump’s microphone) and this audio?

Location, location, location.

In this footage, we’re dealing with a camera phone (with a pretty crappy camera by today’s standards) on the move in front of the AGR site and away from the direction of the shots, according to both the official story and all available video evidence.

The audio on this footage indicates a first shooter for shots 1-3, and a second shooter for shots 4-8.

Where could a second shooter have been placed?

In the upper windows of the building directly behind the roof where Crook’s was positioned which is a two-storey building.

Here’s recent video footage of people (employees?) inside the second-floor room overlooking the lower roof with a clear vantage point toward the rally stage and grandstands.

That footage was shot from the window marked in green in this image. There is another window closer to Crooks’ location providing similar trajectories.

The footage you’re about to see is terrible as usual given compression and recompression from who knows how many downloads and reuploads, but it’s the audio we’re concerned with. The video is useful for simply placing the microphone’s location.

Here is the footage which the audio was extracted from.

What’s interesting about this video is the number of eyewitnesses so close to Crooks, many with their phones out filming. After shot ten, the final shot we hear these people gathered beneath that tree say, “He’s gone. He’s gone.”

Do ANY of these people have footage of Crooks firing his weapon and why isn’t that making the rounds anywhere online?

Unless they’re referring to Trump when they say “He’s gone,” by their observations and chatter it sounds like shot number 9 didn’t kill Crooks, and it wasn’t until shot number 10 that he was put down. But two shots from the Secret Service don’t align with the official story.

According to the head of the Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle in her Congressional testimony yesterday, only ONE shot was fired by the Secret Service.

She claimed to have debriefed the Secret Service sniper who fired that ONE shot. That shot (9) most likely came from the furthest barn from Crooks, where the only sniper team had a clear shot. Shot 9 also has a distinct sound signature from all other shots.

Cheatle perjured herself a hundred times yesterday, which was her job, and it was announced this morning that she finally resigned.

Could that final shot 10 heard ten seconds after shots 4-9 have also come from inside the AGR building? Maybe someone killing the second shooter?

Dead men tell no tales.

The following image gives us a rough estimate of where the person filming was walking at the time the shots rang out, so we can account for very different sound signatures.

Follow the red triangles.

The person is facing north by northwest when the first three shots ring out from what should be behind them and to the east about 240 feet, according to the official story. As they turn, the next five shots are captured with the camera’s microphone in a slightly different location facing southeast, still at least 230 feet from where Crooks was supposed to be firing.

We know this individual couldn’t have walked more than ten feet in two seconds, and probably closer to five feet. The pan of the camera doesn’t mean they moved very far from where they heard the first three shots. Other than the camera direction, the audio captured by the microphone should be far more similar between shots 1-3 as in shots 4-8, IF we have a lone gunman.

Camera phones typically have omnidirectional microphones, capturing audio from all directions. The person is holding their phone camera horizontally, presumably with the microphone on the bottom edge, in this case, most likely the right side or side nearest the shooters. We would have to know if they are right-handed or left-handed to be 100% sure. Let’s assume they are right-handed. This means that the first three shots SHOULD BE louder than the next five shots in quick succession, but the opposite is true.

Listen to shots 1-8 isolated, followed by the “SNAP” of shot 9, allegedly the ‘kill shot’ from the far sniper team.

Here they are with background screaming minimized.

The signature and sounds are very different.

After too many years of watching YouTube channels like Texas Plinking, Garand Thumb, and Hickok45, it sounds to me like the first three shots are unsuppressed of one caliber, while 4-8 (might be suppressed) of another caliber and possibly fired indoors creating that tinny sound, while the last shot is distant, likely that far sniper team on the barn roof, but who knows.

A second shooter in that location would open up a lot of new questions.

• Did Crooks only fire the first three shots, and if so, was he eliminated before shots 4-8 or did he just lay there on the roof doing nothing?

• Did Crooks fire any shots?

• Was he trying to escape when he was eliminated by shot 9 (or 10), explaining why his body was found with his feet and legs pointing upwards to the sky and not prone?

The Secret Service has admitted that they occupied those windows at the time of the shooting, and we have at least 3 different sound signatures from that day.

Why would they admit they were inside that second story of that building, with windows overlooking the roof where Crooks’ body was found AND the rally area?

Questions beget questions.

Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity analyzed the same footage and audio yesterday including a clip watermarked with TMZ that shows the shooter completely still while those first shots are supposedly fired.

But we have to be careful believing that footage, apart from the fact that it was on TMZ. I recall seeing the same clip in the hours after the shooting with no gunshots. Someone could have easily overlaid those first shots (audio) on top of the video. Martenson admits as much in his video from yesterday (timestamped).

A short video taken from atop the roof toward the windows where the Secret Service was supposed to be stationed (2nd shooter?)

It would have looked like this from that second window, NOT the window nearest Crooks. However, one shooter could have been placed at each window if Crooks never fired his weapon.

A new angle to the official story.

The fact that we still, one week later have no footage of Crooks firing his weapon is astonishing. All those millions of cameras at people’s fingertips, all pointed at themselves.

That’s it for me on this topic Good Citizens.

For real this time.

Seriously.

Enjoy the cover-up.

Within a month most people will have moved on to watch the next “current thing” get twisted and maimed.

Come on, baby. Let’s do the twist.

Come on, baby.

Fixed Income Pensioner Discount (honor system)

Student Discount (valid .edu email)

Thank you for sharing

The Good Citizen is now on Ko-Fi. Support more works like this with one-time or monthly donations.

Visit shop.thegoodcitizen.live

Donate

BTC: bc1qchkg507t0qtg27fuccgmrfnau9s3nk4kvgkwk0
LTC: LgQVM7su3dXPCpHLMsARzvVXmky1PMeDwY
XLM: GDC347O6EWCMP7N5ISSXYEL54Z7PNQZYNBQ7RVMJMFMAVT6HUNSVIP64
DASH: XtxYWFuUKPbz6eQbpQNP8As6Uxm968R9nu
XMR: 42ESfh5mdZ5f5vryjRjRzkEYWVnY7uGaaD