Pfizer Board Member Fact Checking Pfizer for Reuters
Pfizer Board Member Fact Checking Pfizer for Reuters
Thomson Reuters Foundation President and Former Reuters CEO is Pfizer Executive Board Member
They’re laughing at us. They’re pissing on our heads and telling us it’s raining. They have nothing but utter contempt for us.
As I wrote in the pièce de résistance of this Substack last month “Seven Sins in the Time of Covid”, the Greed and corruption are everywhere. Brazenly displayed in plain sight for all to observe. They do this because they know that very few will ever bother to look.
Always keep present in your mind the first Good Citizen rule to understand our world today: never believe anything the corporate media says. Their most insidious of lies come from what they don’t report. Supressio veri. Lies by omission.
Beyond their divisive reporting and rigged narratives, their essential duty is to ignore the greed and corruption, especially when they’re a part of it.
Meet James C. Smith, former CEO of Thomson Reuters until the curious date of March 20, 2020. This was a week into the first major lockdowns for western nations. The Pfizer vaccine was already in development, to what extent depends on what timeline you believe regarding the plandemic. Mr. Smith was serving as an executive board member at Pfizer where he still is today.
He stepped down as CEO of the company, while taking over duties as President and Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Similar to Bill Gates lateral power move to his Global foundation but within the executive halls of the same corporation.
We know fact checking organizations are owned and controlled by the corporate-state media apparats and their oligarch partners. They serve as homework checkers for cheaters. They simply reinforce the lies that are pumped out through the global propaganda machine and get a rubber stamp of true by their dutifully owned fact checking functionaries.
Let’s examine just how effective James’ position on Pfizer’s board has been for their propaganda arm at Reuter’s “fact checking” desk. “Effective” meaning, how many lies have they told? The truth is this Good Citizen could have been clipping “fact check” headlines related to Pfizer’s vaccine all weekend. Here are just a few gems.
Global press DID LIE about FDA approval in late August. The Pfizer vaccine being injected into arms for the past 12 months is still under EUA - Emergency Use Authorization and doesn’t have FDA approval. The FDA approved a different vaccine that has yet to be distributed called Comirnaty.
No mRNA vaccines have ever been successfully produced and until last year’s rigged trials they had never been injected into any humans. That’s as experimental as it gets. There were no animal trials and there is no long term safety data. All risk is assumed by the injected, the only immunity conferred is legal immunity for Pfizer. Pfizer’s own internal documents show the vaccines killed at least 1200 people they know about in the first 90 days. They said nothing and did nothing. Since then the number could be as high as 100,000. We may never know since hospitals and coroners are part of the cover-up.
Since Alzheimer’s is generally a slow, progressing disease, it’s impossible for there to be any evidence. One could just as easily argue with greater logic that there is no evidence that the vaccine does not cause Alzheimer’s in the future. Given its horrible short-term safety profile, imagine the long term data that will emerge in 5-10 years.
Pfizermectin uses the same protease-inhibiting mechanism as Ivermectin to stop viral replication. Ivermectin is actually more effective at stopping Covid and only costs .16 cents per pill compared to $600 for Pfizermectin.
The ex-Pfizer scientist is Michael Yeadon. He’s on the Good Citizen Doctor and Scientist All-Star team. His claim that the vaccines are 50x more likely to kill children than Covid itself is true according to data provided by Dr. Toby Rogers, who calculates if every 5-11 year-old is injected, the vaccines will kill ~5248 children while saving 45. This is a factor of ~115x. Michael Yeadon’s estimate is either conservative or Rogers’ estimate is excessive. Pfizer ignored safety issues in trial data and suppressed deaths in the first 8 months of its vaccine rollout.
There’s really no way to disprove this claim. If we had accurate global data on vaccine deaths we might be able to calculate it one way or another. This claim was made during open panel hearings on FDA approval for “boosters”. One scientist claimed the vaccines kill four people for every life saved so their fact check is false. Is it true? There is certainly evidence for vaccines causing adverse events in four or more for every life saved given that early treatment options are suppressed and hospitals are killing patients with Remdesivir and ventilators.
D-dimer tests conducted by pathologists including Dr. Ryan Cole showed that this is true. The vaccines cause all kinds of problems in the blood stream from clotting to micro-clotting to heart inflammation and strokes. German Chemist Dr. Andreas Noack claimed the vaccines are laced with Graphene Hydroxide which Medical doctors are not familiar with and couldn’t recognize even if they saw it. These function as microscopic razor blades in the blood vessels. This was confirmed in a paper by a Madrid chemist whom Dr. Noack references in the above video.
And what about the News Desk at Reuters? In a headline from December 8, less than a month since the discovery of Omicron they reported on Pfizer’s vaccine being effective with three shots. Amazing work. Did they cite a study? No.
Fast forward three days when actual data emerged from a study at the Omicron epicenter of South Africa.
The third jab will surely do it. If not a fourth and fifth would work but don’t discount the effectiveness of a 9th and 10th Pfizer jab.
The coup de grâce of this insidious propaganda and corruption? Ole Smitty serves on the World Economic Forum’s PACI - Partnering Against Corruption Initiative.
All that propaganda and only an Executive Board seat at Pfizer? They really should be paying ole Smitty a lot more than that six figure salary. And they probably are.
Remember Good Citizens, this is a vaccine so safe, so effective, Pfizer needs a board member to handle their fact checking at the largest global “fact checker” to make sure you line up for the injection.
It’s also so safe the FDA doesn’t want you to know about it until 2096, long after it’s killed you and your family members. By then your great grandchildren will be locked in pods, grazing on bugs while buying Nike Jordan 110s in the metaverse. Their blood will be harvested for infusion into the oldest men on the planet, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates and Ray Kurzweil. Mark Zuckerberg will still be alive too, but only in the Metaverse as his profile name, Data.
Pfizer, Reuters and James Smith would hate it if you shared this article.
Do your part to flatten the herd.
This Holiday Season give the gift of Good Citizen Clothing so family and friends know you’re a good citizen and want them to be a good citizen too.
Get 10% off with code GOODCITIZEN at Forbidden Clothes.
Donate to The Good Citizen
BTC: bc1qchkg507t0qtg27fuccgmrfnau9s3nk4kvgkwk0
ETH: 0xc541a484e4b7368d87Ee6B73563C257388c30776
LTC: LgQVM7su3dXPCpHLMsARzvVXmky1PMeDwY
Posted this to LinkedIn account today, can't wait to get my account terminated...
NO MORE DEATH JABS FOR DUTY REFUSE THE mNRA GENETIC THERAPY INJECTIONS
1) It has been shown by multiple biodistribution studies that the “vaccines” do not stay at the injection site, but cross into the bloodstream and even pass through the blood brain barrier. [1],[2],[3].
2) It has also been shown that the spike protein, also in isolation from the whole virus, causes blood clots to form through several mechanisms. [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This is further confirmed by evidence from autopsies [9], [10], as well as from the exploding numbers in vaccine injury reporting systems (such as VAERS) all over the world.
Therefore, I conclude that the vaccines are unacceptably dangerous.
3) Natural immunity is better, broader, longer lasting, and has better cross reactivity against other strains. By contrast, the antibodies induced by the vaccines are oligoclonal and tend to be non-neutralizing for different strains, raising concerns for ADE. [11], [12], [13], [14]
Considering that there are many highly effective treatments available, especially if started early on, I see no point in investing in these questionable “vaccines” as opposed to therapeutics.
[1] A. Ogata et al: “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients”.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA): “Assessment report – COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna”, Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/005791/0000; page 47/169, last paragraph.
[3] K. Bahl et al: “Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses”; page 1319, Table 1; and page 1325, “Biodistribution Studies”.
[4] S. Theuerkauf et al: “Quantitative assays reveal cell fusion at minimal levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and fusion from without”.
[5] Y. Lei et al: “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impai0.rs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2”.
[6] S. Zhang et al: “SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19”.
[7] E. Avolio et al: “The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein disrupts the cooperative function of human cardiac pericytes – endothelial cells through CD147 receptor-mediated signalling: a potential non-infective mechanism of COVID-19 microvascular disease”. [8] P. Solopov: “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alone may cause lung damage”.
[9] D. Wichmann et al: “Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19 – A Prospective Cohort Study”
[10] T. Hansen et al: “First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against
SARS-CoV-2”
[11] S. Nielsen et al. “SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless ofdisease severity”
[12] L. Wang et al: “Ultrapotent antibodies against diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants”
[13] A. Israel et al: “Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2
mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection”
[14] S. Gazit et al: “Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”
the web of lies & liars