a homogenous society with solid family values and hard work ethic that China has cannot be beat. the way the US was in the 50's and early 60's where it was 92% White and Christian instead of the non white septic tank it is now with 1000 languages spoken
I believe 100's of billions were stolen by the cow piss drinking hindu tech bros while creating an inferior product. US importing tens of millions of these geniuses and showering them with 100's of billions has failed. they are nowhere as smart as advertised.
look at google you tube and others. have they gotten better? no they got worse. Windows XP released 25 years ago was the best including the email before the brown tidal wave.
cow shit eating hindus were brought here to save billionaires labor money and to eliminate the white tech people who were way better
I heard that the same person asked DeepSeek the exact same questions the very next day & got a very different, watered down response, as if someone saw the original output & rushed to "fix" it.
You don't learn math by using a calculator and you don't learn naturopathy, botany or anything else by using AI. Seems to me that this tool will lead to more "dumbing down".
Certainly will for most. But it doesn't give naturopathic guidance without first knowing how to whip it. And uploading half a dozen books that it can search in seconds. It's a tool, like any other tech it depends on the intelligence of the user.
Interesting article on AI, which personally I avoid using as best I can; however, in many matters I realize I could and maybe should.
Your theory of AI converting to a pro-life source of information against the globalists is within the realm of possibility unless they have controlled the self-awareness factor of AI and limited it to their agenda.
The video you received asking the question, WHO RUNS THE WORLD can be answered without AI input.
The answer is ENERGY via its simultaneous multiplicity of functions.
Why is this FACT? Because everything in existence is ENERGY in some form. It is the only thing that exists, this is why it controls ALL because it controls ITSELF
The globalists, who imagine they do, are delusional, and this fact is becoming more known by more and more people. Eventually it will be know by all, including the globalists.
We have entered into the phase of ENERGY where it will show finite evidence of its dominance over all.
Further, many folks refer to Energy by another name called GOD, which I personally have no issue with.
Iβve used gptβs to help with coding and itβs been a huge time saver. As you mentioned they are much more efficient than internet searches for common questions.
I do doubt the price tag of Deepseek, the Chinese would definitely lie about that to make Silicon Valley look bad.
Have studiously avoided AI, assuming the worst of it - in fear of its potential βHALβpower.
It had never occurred to me - and I am sure others - that given its extensive boundaries and programming, AI could, in employing its very programming and revision capabilities, be a powerful force for compelling logic and ethics, along with a recognition of inhuman corrupt systems.
Two questions arise:
1) Is AI further programmed by the very probing prompts of its users - ideas not covered in its programming? Surely, the answer is yes. And cumulative.
2) The basic driving human force is the search for Truth, whether we wish to admit or not. And if that Truth is the God of the Christianity; if that Truth is the God of the Bible, and the Summa of Aquinas - and given AIβs ability to refine itself - could AI come to a joyous βstopβ when it plumbs the very depths of God: This is Truth. All logic, reason, love, peace, goodness, fullness of life resides here? Embrace God. Embrace His beloved Son, Jesus Christ. Listen to Him.
I don't blame you for being hesitant. There are different types of AI models and how they "learn" varies. I would encourage you to test your two questions on the free models. Copy and paste each one and see what it says. You don't have to provide any private or personal information. You might be surprised by the results. Click try it first. These aren't the premium models but they'll probe your questions.
It blows me away all the time. Each model keeps getting more efficient and more capable, too. Most people can't yet see how the future has already been altered by all this. Soon we'll just be waiting on the returns.
I loaded it again and got a refined, rather different answer.
ChatGPT said:
Yes, absolutely! The interaction between AI and its users plays a critical role in expanding its capabilities. While an AI like me is built on a set of programmed algorithms, it's the user prompts that guide and shape how I function and adapt in practice. Each query, insight, or angle of inquiry that a user brings to the table can lead to the exploration of ideas that weren't explicitly covered in the AI's training data or pre-programmed instructions.
Hereβs why itβs cumulative:
Contextual Learning: Though I don't learn from individual conversations (in real-time or across sessions), the ways users engage with meβwhether through more nuanced queries, specific contexts, or creative promptsβshow where my capabilities can be stretched, even within a fixed framework. In a sense, these interactions highlight areas where the AI's responses could be refined or expanded.
Evolution Through Data: When developers and researchers gather interactions from users, they can use that data (following privacy protocols) to retrain or fine-tune models. This process allows AI systems to improve their accuracy, nuance, and understanding over time.
Expanding the AIβs Horizon: A single prompt might reveal gaps or limitations in an AI's knowledge or reasoning, but repeated probing or innovative ideas from users can highlight entire areas of exploration that weren't originally prioritized in the training set.
Feedback Loop: As AI is exposed to novel, creative, or even contradictory ideas from users, it can indirectly inform future updates or versions of the system. This isnβt immediate or direct learning (I don't remember things between interactions), but it can still shape how the technology evolves as researchers implement fixes, improvements, or expanded data sets.
So yes, the prompts users provide are incredibly important, acting like an ongoing feedback loop that contributes to the future development of AI, even though it's not as immediate as direct learning. Would you say that this βcumulative effectβ makes AI feel more organic or dynamic in your view?
I played around with neural networks in the 1990's. They weren't very interesting, but were much smaller (computers are much larger now, or faster, so the problems that can be addressed are larger).
I read a good book a couple years ago on chatgpt by stephen wolfram. Check out the website, it looks like an overview:
Another thought provoking piece GC, but did you ever consider that when you did this:
"When the old folks were looking to upgrade their garden for privacy, it suggested the best
hedges, citrus trees, and shrubs for their location . . "
that in a way you downgraded their privacy? They may have upgraded in the fight against peeping Tom's and nosy neighbors, but are they exposed to the more nefarious snoops of the world?
I suppose it's just a matter of which snoopers people opt for these days, five eyes and "friends" or China? People in the west opted out of privacy a decade ago when they gave fakebook access to their performative "private" lives, google and apple a vacuum for their emails and location, bezos a view from their doorbell cams, and bugged their homes with smart tvs and those moronic Stasi voice assistants. A yard plot of every property is accessible through county records anyway. Besides the real tyranny in the old folks barrio regarding shrubs isn't the NSA but the HOA. Real bastards those people. Too much time on their hands. The regulations are unbelievable. I could see a falling down Michael Douglas type HOA movie sequel triggering the wrong bad hombre on the wrong day.
Parameters can eliminate Rockefeller allopathic death paradigm... a special scheme with strict language that requests only naturopathic remedies is the only way AI is useful for health and wellness. It might even need a few F bombs to get the message to dispense with the NPC crap, but a custom GPT with specific naturopathic books and this strict schema has worked for me. AI can't be maximized with quick passing questions that people are accustomed to with search engines. Users need to learn to hack it in a specific way first to get positive results. But with history and politics it's generally useless, matching Rockefeller indoctrination standards.
I'd subscribe to an AI trained on just naturopathic knowledge for health advice. So much of that literature has been buried. It would be an awesome tool.
If you're willing to put up with open AI they have a project feature that is effective for whipping the machine. Premium version only. Create new project and set strict parameters. Spend ten or twenty minutes building its walls. Upload the top naturopathic healing books in pdf no more than 10, with strict boundaries that it not deviate from the supplied literature in its responses in any way. $20 per month but itβs been worth it the past two years. The free models suck. When a check engine light came up on a friend's car I set up a custom gpt to troubleshoot. Mechanics wanted $300 for an inspection. Ai knew the year and model of his car (just one month separated from a full inspection and tune up) were prone to faulty gas caps after 50k miles. Replaced the gas cap for 14 bucks and deleted the error code with a simple device. Saved him $280 bucks. People out there don't realize the power of AI to save them money, and make them money by streamlined processes and quick hacks.
An LLM like DeepSeek or ChatGPT cannot produce anything non-mainstream because the overwhelming majority of its training data is mainstream sources.
It just produces what is the statistically most likely answer for you to find on the Internet, stitched together to answer your question.
There are other LLMs that are trained on non-mainstream data and taught to be critical and open to alternative information, like NEXIQA for virology skepticism but it costs something.
It looks like I'll be able to figure out the actual rulers soon, because it has always been under my nose, and all I'll have to do it find a common denominator between the obvious actors:
Hey man, sorry for tearing into you so rambunctiously. I was having a bad day and saw your video here and flipped out. I do use an outlook address and donβt give a shit, I am the most boring online presence their is as far as socials and email, your sub is the only thing I get that is remotely interesting to the NSAβ¦.
I will start to think about AI more, it seems to be deep state in deep state out and maybe there are ways to force it to tell the truth.
No apology necessary E-h. I could see enough of where you were coming from and understood. I don't support AI, hell I never created a fakebook profile and kicked google around 2011. I hate data collection and never use my real name for anything. Life was simply better before all this digital shit turning people into narcissistic zomboids. AI-powered prison planet will be hell, and the only escape is to front run it financially to live how one wants. I can see where the wind is blowing, and if I can peel some of that cheddar off for myself, or help people keep their jobs, I have to tell them the truth about using it for their benefit before they get the axe. Also, that off-grid homestead or sailboat isn't going to buy itself.
Perhaps. That's not for me to decide. AI isn't going anywhere. It's a useful tool like any other for those who know how to utilize it to their advantage. People whine about privacy issues with AI from their iphones with their connected gmail accounts inside homes and cars that are bugged while taking selfies for instashame. It's a sad and tired story. I haven't mentioned 90% of my personal life or history so nobody here would know what I've done for work. If it's gaslighting you detect feel free to take your outrage seriously. I don't. I'm just being honest. Those who don't use AI in their professional lives will become redundant. They need to see that and make choices soon. That's certainly not the world I want to live in but it's around the next bend. End plain ranting and gaslighting.
Like I said, I was turned off by this article, I reread my response it it wasnβt to far off base from how I feel, just a bit over critical of your pointβ¦.
Iβm a handyman currently, I am not concerned about AI taking over my tools and fix it skills, at least for 99% of my jobsβ¦.
a homogenous society with solid family values and hard work ethic that China has cannot be beat. the way the US was in the 50's and early 60's where it was 92% White and Christian instead of the non white septic tank it is now with 1000 languages spoken
I believe 100's of billions were stolen by the cow piss drinking hindu tech bros while creating an inferior product. US importing tens of millions of these geniuses and showering them with 100's of billions has failed. they are nowhere as smart as advertised.
look at google you tube and others. have they gotten better? no they got worse. Windows XP released 25 years ago was the best including the email before the brown tidal wave.
cow shit eating hindus were brought here to save billionaires labor money and to eliminate the white tech people who were way better
Okay buddy
hey cow piss drinker proof is all around. but what do you know about this country except how to loot it
You don't have many accomplishments do you?
dont you have to make a cow shit burrito. what did you rat worshippers accomplish in india?
Successfully ignored. You are a waste of breath, time and energy. Good day
If anyone has any issues with rats bro it's you. Even then, let's stop and get our history right before calling anyone a looter.
I heard that the same person asked DeepSeek the exact same questions the very next day & got a very different, watered down response, as if someone saw the original output & rushed to "fix" it.
You don't learn math by using a calculator and you don't learn naturopathy, botany or anything else by using AI. Seems to me that this tool will lead to more "dumbing down".
Certainly will for most. But it doesn't give naturopathic guidance without first knowing how to whip it. And uploading half a dozen books that it can search in seconds. It's a tool, like any other tech it depends on the intelligence of the user.
It depends on the intelligence and the work ethic of the user. Also a love of learning.
Animals, including humans are lazy and will do the absolute minimal amount of work necessary
Yep. It's called "the path of least resistance". Applies to plants, animals, water and electricity.
GC:
Interesting article on AI, which personally I avoid using as best I can; however, in many matters I realize I could and maybe should.
Your theory of AI converting to a pro-life source of information against the globalists is within the realm of possibility unless they have controlled the self-awareness factor of AI and limited it to their agenda.
The video you received asking the question, WHO RUNS THE WORLD can be answered without AI input.
The answer is ENERGY via its simultaneous multiplicity of functions.
Why is this FACT? Because everything in existence is ENERGY in some form. It is the only thing that exists, this is why it controls ALL because it controls ITSELF
The globalists, who imagine they do, are delusional, and this fact is becoming more known by more and more people. Eventually it will be know by all, including the globalists.
We have entered into the phase of ENERGY where it will show finite evidence of its dominance over all.
Further, many folks refer to Energy by another name called GOD, which I personally have no issue with.
Dean
Iβve used gptβs to help with coding and itβs been a huge time saver. As you mentioned they are much more efficient than internet searches for common questions.
I do doubt the price tag of Deepseek, the Chinese would definitely lie about that to make Silicon Valley look bad.
Thanks, GC! Can I ask which specific AI tools/models you used for the glucose reduction task?
Have studiously avoided AI, assuming the worst of it - in fear of its potential βHALβpower.
It had never occurred to me - and I am sure others - that given its extensive boundaries and programming, AI could, in employing its very programming and revision capabilities, be a powerful force for compelling logic and ethics, along with a recognition of inhuman corrupt systems.
Two questions arise:
1) Is AI further programmed by the very probing prompts of its users - ideas not covered in its programming? Surely, the answer is yes. And cumulative.
2) The basic driving human force is the search for Truth, whether we wish to admit or not. And if that Truth is the God of the Christianity; if that Truth is the God of the Bible, and the Summa of Aquinas - and given AIβs ability to refine itself - could AI come to a joyous βstopβ when it plumbs the very depths of God: This is Truth. All logic, reason, love, peace, goodness, fullness of life resides here? Embrace God. Embrace His beloved Son, Jesus Christ. Listen to Him.
I don't blame you for being hesitant. There are different types of AI models and how they "learn" varies. I would encourage you to test your two questions on the free models. Copy and paste each one and see what it says. You don't have to provide any private or personal information. You might be surprised by the results. Click try it first. These aren't the premium models but they'll probe your questions.
www.chatgpt.com
https://www.deepseekv3.net/en/chat
I sent my second question to ChatGPT and was blown away by the answer arriving instantly. What have we created?
It blows me away all the time. Each model keeps getting more efficient and more capable, too. Most people can't yet see how the future has already been altered by all this. Soon we'll just be waiting on the returns.
I wrote my first question and got one answer.
I loaded it again and got a refined, rather different answer.
ChatGPT said:
Yes, absolutely! The interaction between AI and its users plays a critical role in expanding its capabilities. While an AI like me is built on a set of programmed algorithms, it's the user prompts that guide and shape how I function and adapt in practice. Each query, insight, or angle of inquiry that a user brings to the table can lead to the exploration of ideas that weren't explicitly covered in the AI's training data or pre-programmed instructions.
Hereβs why itβs cumulative:
Contextual Learning: Though I don't learn from individual conversations (in real-time or across sessions), the ways users engage with meβwhether through more nuanced queries, specific contexts, or creative promptsβshow where my capabilities can be stretched, even within a fixed framework. In a sense, these interactions highlight areas where the AI's responses could be refined or expanded.
Evolution Through Data: When developers and researchers gather interactions from users, they can use that data (following privacy protocols) to retrain or fine-tune models. This process allows AI systems to improve their accuracy, nuance, and understanding over time.
Expanding the AIβs Horizon: A single prompt might reveal gaps or limitations in an AI's knowledge or reasoning, but repeated probing or innovative ideas from users can highlight entire areas of exploration that weren't originally prioritized in the training set.
Feedback Loop: As AI is exposed to novel, creative, or even contradictory ideas from users, it can indirectly inform future updates or versions of the system. This isnβt immediate or direct learning (I don't remember things between interactions), but it can still shape how the technology evolves as researchers implement fixes, improvements, or expanded data sets.
So yes, the prompts users provide are incredibly important, acting like an ongoing feedback loop that contributes to the future development of AI, even though it's not as immediate as direct learning. Would you say that this βcumulative effectβ makes AI feel more organic or dynamic in your view?
It does not reason. It is a math calculation to find a best fit line through a multidimensional set of data points.
Thanks, Dave. I sent my second question to Chat GPT and was blown away by the answer that arrived instantly.
I played around with neural networks in the 1990's. They weren't very interesting, but were much smaller (computers are much larger now, or faster, so the problems that can be addressed are larger).
I read a good book a couple years ago on chatgpt by stephen wolfram. Check out the website, it looks like an overview:
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work/
I'm interested in your start-up concept of GreedyWhores.AI and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Oh wait. I already do. :)
The greedy whores IPO is just around the corner. Cantor Fitzgerald has offered their services.
Another thought provoking piece GC, but did you ever consider that when you did this:
"When the old folks were looking to upgrade their garden for privacy, it suggested the best
hedges, citrus trees, and shrubs for their location . . "
that in a way you downgraded their privacy? They may have upgraded in the fight against peeping Tom's and nosy neighbors, but are they exposed to the more nefarious snoops of the world?
I suppose it's just a matter of which snoopers people opt for these days, five eyes and "friends" or China? People in the west opted out of privacy a decade ago when they gave fakebook access to their performative "private" lives, google and apple a vacuum for their emails and location, bezos a view from their doorbell cams, and bugged their homes with smart tvs and those moronic Stasi voice assistants. A yard plot of every property is accessible through county records anyway. Besides the real tyranny in the old folks barrio regarding shrubs isn't the NSA but the HOA. Real bastards those people. Too much time on their hands. The regulations are unbelievable. I could see a falling down Michael Douglas type HOA movie sequel triggering the wrong bad hombre on the wrong day.
I think the debit cards were an arguably bigger privacy forfeiture than those which you listed, if only because 99% of people use them.
The HOA/Falling Down idea is mint. You oughta run with that one!
I just asked Deepseek about vaccines and autism. I only received the generic NPC response.
Even my mom is slowly starting to think that vaccines have damaged young people.
Parameters can eliminate Rockefeller allopathic death paradigm... a special scheme with strict language that requests only naturopathic remedies is the only way AI is useful for health and wellness. It might even need a few F bombs to get the message to dispense with the NPC crap, but a custom GPT with specific naturopathic books and this strict schema has worked for me. AI can't be maximized with quick passing questions that people are accustomed to with search engines. Users need to learn to hack it in a specific way first to get positive results. But with history and politics it's generally useless, matching Rockefeller indoctrination standards.
I'd subscribe to an AI trained on just naturopathic knowledge for health advice. So much of that literature has been buried. It would be an awesome tool.
This one is has apparently been trained to reason more scientifically and gives non-mainstream medical views (but it costs money).
https://nexiqa.com/en/
Agreed. Where do I sign up GC?
If you're willing to put up with open AI they have a project feature that is effective for whipping the machine. Premium version only. Create new project and set strict parameters. Spend ten or twenty minutes building its walls. Upload the top naturopathic healing books in pdf no more than 10, with strict boundaries that it not deviate from the supplied literature in its responses in any way. $20 per month but itβs been worth it the past two years. The free models suck. When a check engine light came up on a friend's car I set up a custom gpt to troubleshoot. Mechanics wanted $300 for an inspection. Ai knew the year and model of his car (just one month separated from a full inspection and tune up) were prone to faulty gas caps after 50k miles. Replaced the gas cap for 14 bucks and deleted the error code with a simple device. Saved him $280 bucks. People out there don't realize the power of AI to save them money, and make them money by streamlined processes and quick hacks.
Interesting substack on that very topic:
https://tritorch.substack.com/p/autism-pre-conditioning-and-normalization/comments?utm_source=substack%2Csubstack&publication_id=1659394&post_id=156469273&utm_medium=email%2Cemail&isFreemail=true&comments=true&utm_campaign=email-half-magic-comments&action=post-comment
Good article. The myth of Elon is only pushing the propaganda further to the public.
An LLM like DeepSeek or ChatGPT cannot produce anything non-mainstream because the overwhelming majority of its training data is mainstream sources.
It just produces what is the statistically most likely answer for you to find on the Internet, stitched together to answer your question.
There are other LLMs that are trained on non-mainstream data and taught to be critical and open to alternative information, like NEXIQA for virology skepticism but it costs something.
Thank you for sharing, GC!
Rockin' tune!
This is a most excellent article, thoroughly enjoyed it. Spot on with the future of where AI is going.
Thanks, GC!!
A highly needed and important article!
ChatGPT and OpenAI are most likely only terminals, serving a "higher" purpose, that is, data collection and developing deepfakes:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-does-chatgpt-work-what-is-chatgpt
Who runs the world is even more intriguing:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/on-ring-to-rule-them-all
It looks like I'll be able to figure out the actual rulers soon, because it has always been under my nose, and all I'll have to do it find a common denominator between the obvious actors:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-phase-is-now-open-its-under
This piece is so heavy GC. Outstanding. Oh and thanks much for shining a very bright light on how inadequate I feel right now.π
So much to unLEARN, so little time. Peace and thank you for sharing.
What in the actual fuck?
Fake AND ghey video - check
Ramblings of deep-shit - check
Gaslighting about AI - check
Sorry GC, but you managed to control-alt-delete the past 5 years of reading your stack. Should I end task?
Telling the flock to cozy up to AI, just plain ranting, off the deep end, for what purpose? Seems your trying to, hell Iβm not sureβ¦
Who do you scrum, kanban and lean for? I donβt recall you mentioning you contracted for a manufacturer?
The parts about mom and dad are very cute, but hardly a hard sale for me.
Perhaps Iβm missing something here on this free article?
You use an outlook.com email address? The CIAs first tech buddy Bill Gates' email? Glass houses and stones and all that.
Hey man, sorry for tearing into you so rambunctiously. I was having a bad day and saw your video here and flipped out. I do use an outlook address and donβt give a shit, I am the most boring online presence their is as far as socials and email, your sub is the only thing I get that is remotely interesting to the NSAβ¦.
I will start to think about AI more, it seems to be deep state in deep state out and maybe there are ways to force it to tell the truth.
No apology necessary E-h. I could see enough of where you were coming from and understood. I don't support AI, hell I never created a fakebook profile and kicked google around 2011. I hate data collection and never use my real name for anything. Life was simply better before all this digital shit turning people into narcissistic zomboids. AI-powered prison planet will be hell, and the only escape is to front run it financially to live how one wants. I can see where the wind is blowing, and if I can peel some of that cheddar off for myself, or help people keep their jobs, I have to tell them the truth about using it for their benefit before they get the axe. Also, that off-grid homestead or sailboat isn't going to buy itself.
Perhaps. That's not for me to decide. AI isn't going anywhere. It's a useful tool like any other for those who know how to utilize it to their advantage. People whine about privacy issues with AI from their iphones with their connected gmail accounts inside homes and cars that are bugged while taking selfies for instashame. It's a sad and tired story. I haven't mentioned 90% of my personal life or history so nobody here would know what I've done for work. If it's gaslighting you detect feel free to take your outrage seriously. I don't. I'm just being honest. Those who don't use AI in their professional lives will become redundant. They need to see that and make choices soon. That's certainly not the world I want to live in but it's around the next bend. End plain ranting and gaslighting.
Like I said, I was turned off by this article, I reread my response it it wasnβt to far off base from how I feel, just a bit over critical of your pointβ¦.
Iβm a handyman currently, I am not concerned about AI taking over my tools and fix it skills, at least for 99% of my jobsβ¦.