Before I can get to all the rest, let's start with the premised numerology. There are 27 nations in the EU. Netherlands plus 26 other EU nations the Dutch order applies = 27. How would you then pluck 33rd degree Freemason from that?
Before I can get to all the rest, let's start with the premised numerology. There are 27 nations in the EU. Netherlands plus 26 other EU nations the Dutch order applies = 27. How would you then pluck 33rd degree Freemason from that?
I didn't know how many countries it was in fact, which led me to check online. So please know it wasn't a "I told you so" moment. I see links which state 26, but yes, I can see what you are laying down here. It is almost a moot point. Why..? Because if it is 27, then that number is very charged for them as well. recall the moment Trump kisses the helmet/uniform of the 'dead firefighter' from the final night of the RNC recently? The number 27 was on it. Correlating to 'Jesus'. In the simulation, Jesus and Lucifer, are the same construct. So when Trump kisses the uniform and helmet, it is actually a display of Luciferian worship.
Jesus equalling 27 is in the Septenary cipher, which interestingly enough, is a cipher related to the Bible. Meaning, it is built on the principle of the '7 days it took to create the world' narrative and story from the Bible.
A=1, B=2...G=7 (then back down to 1) K=3, L=2, M=1
(two sets of 13)
N=1,O=2....T=7....U=6, Y=2, Z=1
In accordance with that - J = 4, E =5, S =6, U=6, S=6 = 27
As such, whether 26 or 27, they both refer to Jesus.
Many many things show the significance of 27/72 (reverse order doesn't matter). Think of the 72 virgins promised to a terrorist who blows themself up in jihad.
I'm not doing any 'told you so" game. Actually I do enjoy all the connections between numerology, and the calbal and world events, but this assumes that they knew Brits would vote for Brexit (assuming it wasn't rigged) in 2016 and would finally leave in 2020, because with Croatia becoming member 28 in 2013, if it wasn't for the Brexit referendum, that's where we'd be. Does that change anything?
Sorry, what I meant to suggest was this. Not that the number of countries in the EU would have been set-up for David Icke and where things stand in 2024. That would be funny though if it all revolved around Icke. Though, it is interesting to see how many countries are in the EU and the numerical significance.
What I was implying, and should have been more clear about to stave off confusion.....is that it would have been easy enough for higher-up's within the EU to get all of the EU to work in accordance with one another in order to get Icke a ban on that number of countries. Like a tagger does with spray paint, showing their allegiance, as always. Versus, some number of countries within the EU deciding on their own to ban Icke - say 12 of them did.
Again, to be clear, I do not base my view on David Icke based on this speculation around a number, it is just the cherry (if correct) on top. If this is indeed a simulation (and I think there's compelling evidence for that), and Icke, in his 33rd year of 'doing his work' is big on simulation (which he is), then he is very much in the forefront of gatekeeping truth surrounding simulation and what it entails.
Interestingly enough, I saw a video of Dr. Tom Cowan interviewing David Icke from about 4 months back. Cowan, who has interviewed Icke previously, and calls and considers Icke "a friend", completely entertains Icke's presentation and ideas on simulation during this recent interview. Fast forward to about 30-60 days hence that interview, and Dr. Cowna, in a video speaking by himself, is making a point about logic, and objectivty, and asks "how do I know I'm holding these nail clippers I'm in fact holding?" He then says, "and I'm not going to have any of that simulation crap right now, I've heard enough of that." Hmmmmnn, strange. While on with David Icke, Dr. Cowan is all about simulation, but then in this solo video he denigrates the idea severely. Just interesting to note, as they declare friends of one another. Also, Icke is clearly heavily mixed in with the health freedom movement. So is Dr. cowan, of course.
Interesting change for Cowan. I watched their interview closely and assumed they were more or less exploring the simulation possibility. Icke's latest book the dream covers this prairie. Though when he talks about the likelihood he never seems too certain, though he references theorists who has been trying to sell it for decades. I think Icke believes they're prepearing a post human workd with the next iteration of our species and that we didn't evolve from apes but some intervention took place. I have difficulty dispensing with the physical world our perceptions engulf and absoard da to day with the idea we're already in some kind of synthetic bio software program prepared by an overwatching advanced species. They can't even get windiws softwar to operate correctly after 30 years and il supposed to believe those mountains i just hike were a simulation? The depth and scope of the theory is so broad and yet so lacking in evidence that they would argue that my very skepticism is a matter of limited perception of all the frequencies and unkowables, which you ascribe to any doubters about any theory.
Before I can get to all the rest, let's start with the premised numerology. There are 27 nations in the EU. Netherlands plus 26 other EU nations the Dutch order applies = 27. How would you then pluck 33rd degree Freemason from that?
I didn't know how many countries it was in fact, which led me to check online. So please know it wasn't a "I told you so" moment. I see links which state 26, but yes, I can see what you are laying down here. It is almost a moot point. Why..? Because if it is 27, then that number is very charged for them as well. recall the moment Trump kisses the helmet/uniform of the 'dead firefighter' from the final night of the RNC recently? The number 27 was on it. Correlating to 'Jesus'. In the simulation, Jesus and Lucifer, are the same construct. So when Trump kisses the uniform and helmet, it is actually a display of Luciferian worship.
Jesus equalling 27 is in the Septenary cipher, which interestingly enough, is a cipher related to the Bible. Meaning, it is built on the principle of the '7 days it took to create the world' narrative and story from the Bible.
A=1, B=2...G=7 (then back down to 1) K=3, L=2, M=1
(two sets of 13)
N=1,O=2....T=7....U=6, Y=2, Z=1
In accordance with that - J = 4, E =5, S =6, U=6, S=6 = 27
As such, whether 26 or 27, they both refer to Jesus.
Many many things show the significance of 27/72 (reverse order doesn't matter). Think of the 72 virgins promised to a terrorist who blows themself up in jihad.
I'm not doing any 'told you so" game. Actually I do enjoy all the connections between numerology, and the calbal and world events, but this assumes that they knew Brits would vote for Brexit (assuming it wasn't rigged) in 2016 and would finally leave in 2020, because with Croatia becoming member 28 in 2013, if it wasn't for the Brexit referendum, that's where we'd be. Does that change anything?
Sorry, what I meant to suggest was this. Not that the number of countries in the EU would have been set-up for David Icke and where things stand in 2024. That would be funny though if it all revolved around Icke. Though, it is interesting to see how many countries are in the EU and the numerical significance.
What I was implying, and should have been more clear about to stave off confusion.....is that it would have been easy enough for higher-up's within the EU to get all of the EU to work in accordance with one another in order to get Icke a ban on that number of countries. Like a tagger does with spray paint, showing their allegiance, as always. Versus, some number of countries within the EU deciding on their own to ban Icke - say 12 of them did.
Again, to be clear, I do not base my view on David Icke based on this speculation around a number, it is just the cherry (if correct) on top. If this is indeed a simulation (and I think there's compelling evidence for that), and Icke, in his 33rd year of 'doing his work' is big on simulation (which he is), then he is very much in the forefront of gatekeeping truth surrounding simulation and what it entails.
Interestingly enough, I saw a video of Dr. Tom Cowan interviewing David Icke from about 4 months back. Cowan, who has interviewed Icke previously, and calls and considers Icke "a friend", completely entertains Icke's presentation and ideas on simulation during this recent interview. Fast forward to about 30-60 days hence that interview, and Dr. Cowna, in a video speaking by himself, is making a point about logic, and objectivty, and asks "how do I know I'm holding these nail clippers I'm in fact holding?" He then says, "and I'm not going to have any of that simulation crap right now, I've heard enough of that." Hmmmmnn, strange. While on with David Icke, Dr. Cowan is all about simulation, but then in this solo video he denigrates the idea severely. Just interesting to note, as they declare friends of one another. Also, Icke is clearly heavily mixed in with the health freedom movement. So is Dr. cowan, of course.
Interesting change for Cowan. I watched their interview closely and assumed they were more or less exploring the simulation possibility. Icke's latest book the dream covers this prairie. Though when he talks about the likelihood he never seems too certain, though he references theorists who has been trying to sell it for decades. I think Icke believes they're prepearing a post human workd with the next iteration of our species and that we didn't evolve from apes but some intervention took place. I have difficulty dispensing with the physical world our perceptions engulf and absoard da to day with the idea we're already in some kind of synthetic bio software program prepared by an overwatching advanced species. They can't even get windiws softwar to operate correctly after 30 years and il supposed to believe those mountains i just hike were a simulation? The depth and scope of the theory is so broad and yet so lacking in evidence that they would argue that my very skepticism is a matter of limited perception of all the frequencies and unkowables, which you ascribe to any doubters about any theory.