" Just pray that that horizon is not loaded up with mushroom clouds. "
I used to do the same, JVC, but I've changed my thinking about nuclear power and weapons. Have you ever heard of Galen Winsor? He worked at a fairly high level in the nuclear power industry post WWII, and he had a very interesting perspective on the "dangers" of nuclea…
" Just pray that that horizon is not loaded up with mushroom clouds. "
I used to do the same, JVC, but I've changed my thinking about nuclear power and weapons. Have you ever heard of Galen Winsor? He worked at a fairly high level in the nuclear power industry post WWII, and he had a very interesting perspective on the "dangers" of nuclear waste and radioactive fallout.
Essentially, he acknowledged that a nuclear bomb like the ones dropped on Japan are powerful and dangerous - but in the short term, not the long term. (Note that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are both safe, healthy cities to live in today.) He also argued that nuclear power is far safer than we've been told, and that nuclear "waste" is really an extremely valuable energy source.
If you're interested, this 45 minute video from a talk he gave in 1982 will give you some food for thought:
So don't worry about the mushroom clouds (unless you are really close by!), but do, definitely, keep that black electrical tape on your computer. I do the same! No one needs to know what I look like when I stumble onto my computer first thing in the morning, except my poor husband.
Is there NOTHING our Governments haven't lied to us about??
Galen Winsor was a safety officer at the Hanford Nuclear site - location of the first U.S plutonium-producing reactor.
He spent the next 35 years processing plutonium across several nuclear facilities, and was recognised by the Atomic Energy Commission as one of the world's foremost authorities on nuclear radiation management, before later dedicating his career to Public Speaking/Whistleblowing.
He describes the cesium-contaminated pool containing the spent fuel rods as quite beautiful with its submerged lighting, water the colour of a Tahitian lagoon, and maintained at a balmy 38°C.
He swam in it every day.
He also kept a glass of drinking water from it on his desk.
When the reactors at Hanford were decommissioned at the end of the cold war, the site housed 177 storage tanks containing hundreds of thousands of tons of high-level radioactive waste.
His offer to Industry Reps to remove and properly dispose of the waste at no cost, was immediately rejected because they indicated it was highly valuable as a commodity and highly profitable to the Government.
(Hasn't the same government told us it's so dangerous it needs to be entombed for 100,000 years??).
An article titled "Fukushima and Reflections on Radiation as a Terror Weapon" published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in 2014 discusses the irresponsible fear mongering and intentional misleading of the Public, and quotes the late Theodore Rockwell: "Apocalyptic consequences from a reactor mishap are not just highly improbable, but impossible".
Like free energy before it (shutdown when TPTB recognized that it denied them otherwise billion dollar profits) they also came to understand the potential of utilising fear to first weaponize, then monetize, resources on the backs of "public safety" fear mongering campaigns.
Article "Fukushima and Reflections on Radiation as a Terror Weapon"
I spent so many years of my life anxious about nuclear power. I already had a sense it was a pack of lies, but this article really exposes the propaganda that low level radiation (such as that from nuclear power) is any kind of danger.
The next thing you have to ask yourself after reading this information is, why are they so interested in keeping us fearful of a form of energy that could literally transform our world for the better?
I was exactly the same Anna. Despite hearing so many background murmerings for years, that nuclear energy was one of safest, cleanest energy sources we have, I - like most people - bought the lie. It has not been until recently that doubts around the mainstream narrative have entered my consciousness. Galen Winsor's statements, the article I linked above, plus the one I link below (ESPECIALLY the one I link below - which raises a strong case that the damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was much more likely to be attributable to incendiary devices, not to an atomic bomb) have given me a whole new perspective.
What better boogieman to keep up their sleeve than "total planetary annihilation". One couldn't wish for a more powerful threat to humanity. And fear of it keeps us all afraid of nuclear energy, and subservient to paying ever-increasing energy bills by exploiting our fear and ignorance (and making those doing the exploiting exceedingly wealthy in the process, because they've convinced us the alternatives are just too dangerous).
The Duke Report article you linked to was very interesting - thanks for sharing it. I'd heard the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were likely incendiary, not nuclear, but that article was pretty thorough!
A few parallels to more recent psy-ops that occurred to me while reading:
- using mustard gas to mimic radiation sickness reminded me of the way respiratory illnesses were mis-characterized as "a novel illness" during covid;
- developing weapons-grade uranium in an incredibly short time period reminded me of how they "miraculously" developed the covid vaccine in months, instead of years;
- the eye-witness reports of multiple explosions in the Japanese cities reminded me of the multiple blasts heard when "airplanes" hit the Twin
Towers on 9-11.
And of course, all the money thrown at the Manhatten Project to supposedly develop nuclear bombs reminded me of the money-laundering project known as Landing on the Moon.
EDIT: from the final chapter (which nicely ties to the premise of all the events in your comment above):
"Why was it done?
The war might have ended weeks earlier, he [MacArthur] said,
if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the
retention of the institution of the emperor. [Norman Cousins, 311, p. 71].
Several hypothetical motives for staging the ‘atomic’ bombings are considered. The most widely espoused motive—namely, shocking Japan into surrender—is rejected for the following reasons:
1. Japan was not surprised but colluded in the bombings, and
2. Japan had long been ready to surrender on terms similar to those implemented after the war.
The alternate explanation that the bombings were staged in order to intimidate Stalin is dismissed, not only because Stalin was not intimidated, but also because such a plan could not even have been expected to work.
We propose that the ‘atomic’ bombings were acts of state terror, directed at the international general public: general fear of impending nuclear war should induce the people to voluntarily surrender their national sovereignty and submit to a world government. The motives behind this plan and the reasons for its failure are examined."
You hit the nail on the head in that last paragraph.
The citizens of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were the first casualties of the bombings in the summer of 1945... but every other member of the human race was an intended target for decades to follow.
It's hard to think of the entities who were "in on it" as legitimate members of humanity.
" Just pray that that horizon is not loaded up with mushroom clouds. "
I used to do the same, JVC, but I've changed my thinking about nuclear power and weapons. Have you ever heard of Galen Winsor? He worked at a fairly high level in the nuclear power industry post WWII, and he had a very interesting perspective on the "dangers" of nuclear waste and radioactive fallout.
Essentially, he acknowledged that a nuclear bomb like the ones dropped on Japan are powerful and dangerous - but in the short term, not the long term. (Note that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are both safe, healthy cities to live in today.) He also argued that nuclear power is far safer than we've been told, and that nuclear "waste" is really an extremely valuable energy source.
If you're interested, this 45 minute video from a talk he gave in 1982 will give you some food for thought:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VvGw1tkT1Q
So don't worry about the mushroom clouds (unless you are really close by!), but do, definitely, keep that black electrical tape on your computer. I do the same! No one needs to know what I look like when I stumble onto my computer first thing in the morning, except my poor husband.
Indeed.
Is there NOTHING our Governments haven't lied to us about??
Galen Winsor was a safety officer at the Hanford Nuclear site - location of the first U.S plutonium-producing reactor.
He spent the next 35 years processing plutonium across several nuclear facilities, and was recognised by the Atomic Energy Commission as one of the world's foremost authorities on nuclear radiation management, before later dedicating his career to Public Speaking/Whistleblowing.
He describes the cesium-contaminated pool containing the spent fuel rods as quite beautiful with its submerged lighting, water the colour of a Tahitian lagoon, and maintained at a balmy 38°C.
He swam in it every day.
He also kept a glass of drinking water from it on his desk.
When the reactors at Hanford were decommissioned at the end of the cold war, the site housed 177 storage tanks containing hundreds of thousands of tons of high-level radioactive waste.
His offer to Industry Reps to remove and properly dispose of the waste at no cost, was immediately rejected because they indicated it was highly valuable as a commodity and highly profitable to the Government.
(Hasn't the same government told us it's so dangerous it needs to be entombed for 100,000 years??).
An article titled "Fukushima and Reflections on Radiation as a Terror Weapon" published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in 2014 discusses the irresponsible fear mongering and intentional misleading of the Public, and quotes the late Theodore Rockwell: "Apocalyptic consequences from a reactor mishap are not just highly improbable, but impossible".
Like free energy before it (shutdown when TPTB recognized that it denied them otherwise billion dollar profits) they also came to understand the potential of utilising fear to first weaponize, then monetize, resources on the backs of "public safety" fear mongering campaigns.
Article "Fukushima and Reflections on Radiation as a Terror Weapon"
https://www.jpands.org/vol19no2/orient.pdf
The article you linked to is a gem.
I spent so many years of my life anxious about nuclear power. I already had a sense it was a pack of lies, but this article really exposes the propaganda that low level radiation (such as that from nuclear power) is any kind of danger.
The next thing you have to ask yourself after reading this information is, why are they so interested in keeping us fearful of a form of energy that could literally transform our world for the better?
I was exactly the same Anna. Despite hearing so many background murmerings for years, that nuclear energy was one of safest, cleanest energy sources we have, I - like most people - bought the lie. It has not been until recently that doubts around the mainstream narrative have entered my consciousness. Galen Winsor's statements, the article I linked above, plus the one I link below (ESPECIALLY the one I link below - which raises a strong case that the damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was much more likely to be attributable to incendiary devices, not to an atomic bomb) have given me a whole new perspective.
What better boogieman to keep up their sleeve than "total planetary annihilation". One couldn't wish for a more powerful threat to humanity. And fear of it keeps us all afraid of nuclear energy, and subservient to paying ever-increasing energy bills by exploiting our fear and ignorance (and making those doing the exploiting exceedingly wealthy in the process, because they've convinced us the alternatives are just too dangerous).
https://open.substack.com/pub/thedukereport/p/exposing-the-real-story-of-hiroshima?r=nll84&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
The Duke Report article you linked to was very interesting - thanks for sharing it. I'd heard the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were likely incendiary, not nuclear, but that article was pretty thorough!
A few parallels to more recent psy-ops that occurred to me while reading:
- using mustard gas to mimic radiation sickness reminded me of the way respiratory illnesses were mis-characterized as "a novel illness" during covid;
- developing weapons-grade uranium in an incredibly short time period reminded me of how they "miraculously" developed the covid vaccine in months, instead of years;
- the eye-witness reports of multiple explosions in the Japanese cities reminded me of the multiple blasts heard when "airplanes" hit the Twin
Towers on 9-11.
And of course, all the money thrown at the Manhatten Project to supposedly develop nuclear bombs reminded me of the money-laundering project known as Landing on the Moon.
Very prescient observations - all of them with a common denominator of public deception.
The Duke Report article was eye-opening.
One of the commenters kindly posted the link to a free pdf of the book on which the article is based if you're interested.
Just a scan of the index was intriguing.
https://archive.is/INd0K
EDIT: from the final chapter (which nicely ties to the premise of all the events in your comment above):
"Why was it done?
The war might have ended weeks earlier, he [MacArthur] said,
if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the
retention of the institution of the emperor. [Norman Cousins, 311, p. 71].
Several hypothetical motives for staging the ‘atomic’ bombings are considered. The most widely espoused motive—namely, shocking Japan into surrender—is rejected for the following reasons:
1. Japan was not surprised but colluded in the bombings, and
2. Japan had long been ready to surrender on terms similar to those implemented after the war.
The alternate explanation that the bombings were staged in order to intimidate Stalin is dismissed, not only because Stalin was not intimidated, but also because such a plan could not even have been expected to work.
We propose that the ‘atomic’ bombings were acts of state terror, directed at the international general public: general fear of impending nuclear war should induce the people to voluntarily surrender their national sovereignty and submit to a world government. The motives behind this plan and the reasons for its failure are examined."
You hit the nail on the head in that last paragraph.
The citizens of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were the first casualties of the bombings in the summer of 1945... but every other member of the human race was an intended target for decades to follow.
It's hard to think of the entities who were "in on it" as legitimate members of humanity.