I'm skeptical. But I don't know much about boxing. It happens too fast for my unlearned eyes.
But the dude is clearly a dude.
I want to ask this: Imagine there were no lies about this, and they did three categories like this: only females, only males, and only political ideologues; and if males and females were allowed to compete in the sa…
I'm skeptical. But I don't know much about boxing. It happens too fast for my unlearned eyes.
But the dude is clearly a dude.
I want to ask this: Imagine there were no lies about this, and they did three categories like this: only females, only males, and only political ideologues; and if males and females were allowed to compete in the same category of any sport, and some people did it willfully, because of ideology, and left the rest of the people alone to function normally, would then anyone care about a male boxer hitting a female boxer?
That is to say: is there really a problem, or is it just ideological theater and the injustice it creates for most people who want normality?
You can see her nose is already going rudolf just thirty seconds into the fight when she grabs the ropes and resigns.
Yes, the dude is clearly a dude.
That's an interesting question you've proposed. I suppose it all depends on a person's principles. However I find people of all ideologies... eventually when challenged, the least principled among us, so maybe some wouldn't care.
Yes it's a real problem - unless you want to extend political idealogues to being allowed to have their own prisons that women can be encarcerated in with men if they wish and their own bathrooms in every restaurant and their own changing room in every facility and their own political idealogue lesbian and gay meetings and not feel excluded if they can't attend women only events.....https://jowaller.substack.com/p/transactivism-is-a-war-on-women?utm_source=publication-search
Quote: "From what I understand, Khelif might have the XY chromosomes (typically seen in males), but the external genitals are female. She was assigned female at birth. From what I’ve read, often these types of people don’t know they are different until they hit puberty."
The word “assigned” is communism, in that context. I assign exactly zero (0) credibility or relevance to anyone who pretends “assign” is a real thing, in that context. I will not use the poisonous language of the people who want me dead, and neither should anyone else.
More technically, I do not believe in chromosomes.
Okay, that’s kind of a joke.
First, chromosomes are not really important. It’s just a modern pseudoscientific myth. The entire concept of genes determining anything is as false as communism.
Chromosomes are believed to be an encapsulation of genes that appears on cell division. They are not “there” normally. By metonymy, people use chromosomes instead of genes or genome. Not the same ting. But, more importantly, people are now used to the idea that one specific pair of chromosomes is different in males and females, and that is used as a proxy to say what the sex of the individual is. Total bullshit. Look at the genitals. Dangleberries implies male. Very easy.
Let’s start saving money by not buying into the religion of scientific communism.
Then she is a woman. No dick and and no balls plus a vulva with a vagina that leads to the uterus equals female.
Does she has ovaries and a uterus? not that it interests me that much. But even if she is naturally sterile, not having a functional female reproductive system, she's still a woman, and she belongs to that sporting category. Maybe, if she lacks the hormonal cycle that prepares reproduction, she happens to have a natural advantage as an Amazon warrior would. Then there is no fraud. It's just unusual. Too bad for the other competitors.
A different story would be if she is a woman but cheated. What if she was given male hormones years ago, with the intention of giving her an sporting advantage? That should be enough to kick her out for ever. And the country too: that's worse than slavery.
That's what East Germany, the communist tyranny, did to some sports women. That's a horrendous thing to do!
They say that centuries ago some boy choir singers were intentionally operated on to cut off their testicles, so that they could keep their singing voice. That's pure evil! Why would any person have any problem in understanding this crime? Other people's bodies are not your body! It's a simple rule. (I shudder to think that I have to explain that children and adolescents are also people, and they also have a negative right to not be operated on like the castrati, or to not be chemically assaulted like sports women)
And those laws that coerce people to speak the way the communists want them to speak are also evil, and must be ignored and revoked, and the legislators who voted for them should be prosecuted as traitors.
But, to finish this exchange on my side, if the person we are talking about is actually a human male, he should not be competing as a female. If she is actually a female, she is in the right category. And if he is intersex, which I don't believe for a minute, he should have his own third category. And if there are no competitors, then he cannot compete. Not my problem.
See how easy it is to be a clear thinker sometimes?
As far as I can tell they are some kind of intersex. If you read the article it will make more sense.
It doesn't really matter anyway because it was a mismatch regardless of how we define the sex of the boxer. If a heavyweight boxer got into the ring with a featherweight boxer this would also be a mismatch.
The female boxer should have just refused to fight to begin with. Problem solved.
I'm skeptical. But I don't know much about boxing. It happens too fast for my unlearned eyes.
But the dude is clearly a dude.
I want to ask this: Imagine there were no lies about this, and they did three categories like this: only females, only males, and only political ideologues; and if males and females were allowed to compete in the same category of any sport, and some people did it willfully, because of ideology, and left the rest of the people alone to function normally, would then anyone care about a male boxer hitting a female boxer?
That is to say: is there really a problem, or is it just ideological theater and the injustice it creates for most people who want normality?
You can see her nose is already going rudolf just thirty seconds into the fight when she grabs the ropes and resigns.
Yes, the dude is clearly a dude.
That's an interesting question you've proposed. I suppose it all depends on a person's principles. However I find people of all ideologies... eventually when challenged, the least principled among us, so maybe some wouldn't care.
LOL "yes the dude is clearly a dude."
Yes it's a real problem - unless you want to extend political idealogues to being allowed to have their own prisons that women can be encarcerated in with men if they wish and their own bathrooms in every restaurant and their own changing room in every facility and their own political idealogue lesbian and gay meetings and not feel excluded if they can't attend women only events.....https://jowaller.substack.com/p/transactivism-is-a-war-on-women?utm_source=publication-search
"But the dude is clearly a dude."
Not so simple according to a female boxer who seems to know what she is talking about.
The Imane Khelif boxing controversy is not what it seems.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-147264149
Quote: "From what I understand, Khelif might have the XY chromosomes (typically seen in males), but the external genitals are female. She was assigned female at birth. From what I’ve read, often these types of people don’t know they are different until they hit puberty."
The word “assigned” is communism, in that context. I assign exactly zero (0) credibility or relevance to anyone who pretends “assign” is a real thing, in that context. I will not use the poisonous language of the people who want me dead, and neither should anyone else.
More technically, I do not believe in chromosomes.
Okay, that’s kind of a joke.
First, chromosomes are not really important. It’s just a modern pseudoscientific myth. The entire concept of genes determining anything is as false as communism.
Chromosomes are believed to be an encapsulation of genes that appears on cell division. They are not “there” normally. By metonymy, people use chromosomes instead of genes or genome. Not the same ting. But, more importantly, people are now used to the idea that one specific pair of chromosomes is different in males and females, and that is used as a proxy to say what the sex of the individual is. Total bullshit. Look at the genitals. Dangleberries implies male. Very easy.
Let’s start saving money by not buying into the religion of scientific communism.
"Look at the genitals. Dangleberries implies male. Very easy."
Yes but according to the female boxer I linked above the genitals appeared female at birth, which is why they were assigned female at birth.
Then she is a woman. No dick and and no balls plus a vulva with a vagina that leads to the uterus equals female.
Does she has ovaries and a uterus? not that it interests me that much. But even if she is naturally sterile, not having a functional female reproductive system, she's still a woman, and she belongs to that sporting category. Maybe, if she lacks the hormonal cycle that prepares reproduction, she happens to have a natural advantage as an Amazon warrior would. Then there is no fraud. It's just unusual. Too bad for the other competitors.
A different story would be if she is a woman but cheated. What if she was given male hormones years ago, with the intention of giving her an sporting advantage? That should be enough to kick her out for ever. And the country too: that's worse than slavery.
That's what East Germany, the communist tyranny, did to some sports women. That's a horrendous thing to do!
They say that centuries ago some boy choir singers were intentionally operated on to cut off their testicles, so that they could keep their singing voice. That's pure evil! Why would any person have any problem in understanding this crime? Other people's bodies are not your body! It's a simple rule. (I shudder to think that I have to explain that children and adolescents are also people, and they also have a negative right to not be operated on like the castrati, or to not be chemically assaulted like sports women)
And those laws that coerce people to speak the way the communists want them to speak are also evil, and must be ignored and revoked, and the legislators who voted for them should be prosecuted as traitors.
But, to finish this exchange on my side, if the person we are talking about is actually a human male, he should not be competing as a female. If she is actually a female, she is in the right category. And if he is intersex, which I don't believe for a minute, he should have his own third category. And if there are no competitors, then he cannot compete. Not my problem.
See how easy it is to be a clear thinker sometimes?
As far as I can tell they are some kind of intersex. If you read the article it will make more sense.
It doesn't really matter anyway because it was a mismatch regardless of how we define the sex of the boxer. If a heavyweight boxer got into the ring with a featherweight boxer this would also be a mismatch.
The female boxer should have just refused to fight to begin with. Problem solved.
I agree.
You keep using the plural, I don’t know if my frail emotions can withstand this deep pain I feel.
Let me recommend a soundtrack for our encounter: Lola, by the kinks.
some men - like caster semenya have undescended testes- this a women doth not make.https://jowaller.substack.com/p/sex-vs-gender-identity?utm_source=publication-search